This is Chapter 12 in our series exploring the Fourth Way and the practice of becoming more conscious in everyday life.

Start at Chapter 1:

In the last chapter, we asked a deceptively simple question: Who is watching? We discovered that thoughts can be observed, emotions can be observed, reactions can be observed, and even the different personalities that seem to move through us during the day can be observed. If something within me can notice all of these things, perhaps I am not merely the thoughts, emotions, and reactions themselves.

But recognizing this is only the beginning.

The greater challenge is remembering it while life is actually happening.

It is relatively easy to sit quietly and observe ourselves. It is much harder when someone says something that irritates us, when the phone rings at the wrong time, when something breaks, when we are hurried, criticized, disappointed, frightened, or simply tired. In those moments, we usually do not remember that we are observing anything. We become the reaction.

This is where the Fourth Way introduces the practice of self-remembering.

The term can sound complicated, but the idea is surprisingly practical. Self-remembering means becoming aware of ourselves while we are experiencing the world around us. Instead of our attention being completely swallowed by what is happening, part of our attention remains aware that I am here, experiencing this.

Suppose I am walking across the yard. Normally my body may be walking while my mind is somewhere else entirely. I may be replaying yesterday’s conversation or thinking about what I need to do tomorrow. My feet are touching the ground, the wind is blowing, birds may be calling, and the sunlight may be coming through the trees, yet I barely experience any of it.

Then suddenly I remember.

I feel my feet touching the ground. I notice my breathing. I hear the sounds around me. I become aware of my body moving through the landscape. At the same time, I recognize that I am the one experiencing it.

For a moment, I am actually there.

Nothing supernatural has happened. The world has not changed.

I have changed my relationship to it.

Perhaps this is why the word remembering is so appropriate. We are not acquiring something new. We are remembering something that was already present but forgotten.

Most of us have experienced this without giving it a name. Perhaps while watching a sunset, sitting beside someone we love, walking through the woods, standing beneath a clear night sky, or hearing music that suddenly touches something deep within us. For a brief moment, the usual stream of thought becomes quieter, and we become intensely aware of being alive.

The Fourth Way asks whether those moments must always happen accidentally.

Can we learn to invite them?

Self-remembering begins with very small things. Feel your hand on a steering wheel. Notice your feet on the floor while talking with someone. Become aware of your breathing before answering a difficult question. Feel the sensation in your abdomen when irritation begins to rise. Notice the tone of your own voice.

These practices seem almost too simple to matter.

But something important happens when we do them.

We create a tiny space between the impression coming toward us and the reaction that normally follows it.

A comment is made.

An emotion rises.

The old response prepares itself.

And then something within us remembers.

I am here.

That moment of remembering may be only a second long, but it can change what happens next.

Instead of immediately defending ourselves, we may listen. Instead of speaking sharply, we may remain silent. Instead of automatically accepting the fearful thought moving through our mind, we may recognize it simply as a thought. Instead of allowing anger to take the throne, we may notice the anger before handing it authority.

This connects directly with the practice we have been developing throughout this series:

See. Observe. Pause. Discern. Respond.

Self-remembering is what begins to hold those steps together.

Without remembering ourselves, we usually discover our reaction afterward. We think, Why did I say that? Why did I become so upset? Why did I allow that to bother me?

With increasing awareness, we begin catching the reaction sooner.

Eventually we may begin to catch the coronation itself—the moment when some temporary thought, fear, emotion, desire, or wounded part of ourselves attempts to climb onto the throne and declare itself king.

That is a very different way of living.

The goal is not to suppress emotion or become detached from life. Quite the opposite. We begin experiencing life more fully because we are actually present for it.

We can feel anger without becoming nothing but anger.

We can experience sadness without losing ourselves inside sadness.

We can feel fear without automatically allowing fear to make the decision.

We can enjoy pleasure without needing to cling to it.

We can receive an impression before immediately judging it.

The various parts of ourselves are still there. The instinctive part still protects the body. The emotional part still feels deeply. The thinking part still analyzes. The moving part still acts. Our memories, personality, experiences, wounds, hopes, and habits remain part of us.

The question is no longer whether these parts exist.

The question becomes:

Which part of me is answering?

And perhaps even more importantly:

Am I present enough to notice?

There is also a spiritual dimension to this practice that I find difficult to ignore.

Jesus repeatedly called people to wakefulness: watch, be ready, keep awake. Whatever theological meaning we may attach to those passages, there is also something profoundly practical in them. A person cannot consciously love, forgive, serve, listen, or seek truth while completely asleep inside an automatic reaction.

To be spiritually awake must involve, at least in some sense, becoming present.

This does not mean placing ourselves on God’s throne or replacing Christ with some supposedly higher version of ourselves. That has never been the purpose of this series. The “false king” we have been examining is the ego, the mechanical personality, and the lesser parts of ourselves that continually attempt to rule the inner garden.

The deeper King points toward that God-oriented center within us—the place of conscience, truth, humility, love, awareness, and conscious choice.

Perhaps self-remembering helps us become quiet enough to hear it.

There is an interesting paradox here. The more we try to force ourselves to be present every second, the more tense and artificial the practice can become. We do not need to walk around continually saying, I am observing myself. I am observing myself.

That simply creates another voice in the head.

Instead, we practice gently.

While washing dishes, feel the warm water.

While walking, feel your feet.

While listening, notice whether you are truly listening or preparing your reply.

When irritation arises, notice where it appears in the body.

When the mind races into tomorrow, notice that it has left today.

Then return.

Again and again.

There will be hundreds of times when we forget.

That is not failure.

The moment we realize we have forgotten is itself another moment of awakening.

Perhaps this is how consciousness grows—not through one dramatic transformation, but through thousands of small returns.

We forget.

We remember.

We become identified.

We observe.

We react.

We catch ourselves.

We fall asleep again.

We awaken again.

Over time, something begins to change. The space between stimulus and response becomes a little wider. The mechanical reaction loses some of its authority. We begin recognizing familiar patterns before they completely take control.

And slowly, almost unnoticed, the throne no longer changes occupants quite so easily.

That may be one of the deepest purposes of self-remembering.

It is not merely remembering who we think we are.

It is remembering that beneath all the thoughts, emotions, roles, memories, and reactions passing through us, there is an awareness capable of seeing them.

And when that awareness is present, we have a choice.

Perhaps the real work of awakening is simply learning to remember ourselves often enough that, when the important moments arrive, someone is home.

Continue the Journey

Previous: Chapter 11 — Who Is Watching?

Next: Chapter 13

If this series has caused you to stop and observe something within yourself that you had not noticed before, consider sharing it with someone who might enjoy making the same journey. Sometimes one simple question—“Which part of me is answering?”—can open a door we did not even realize was there.

Share

Leave a comment

Part of the series Get the King Out of the Garden: A Practical Journey into Self-Observation

New to the series? [Start at Chapter 1 →

In the previous chapters, we have looked at the strange realization that what we normally call “I” may not be nearly as unified as we assume. One part of us wants to get up early and exercise, while another wants to stay in bed. One part decides to eat better, while another reaches for something it had promised not to eat. One part wants peace, while another is already preparing the argument it intends to have tomorrow. The Fourth Way asks us not to condemn these different parts of ourselves, but simply to begin noticing them.

Once we begin doing that, however, an even more interesting question appears: Who is doing the noticing?

If I can observe anger arising within me, am I the anger? If I can notice fear moving through me, am I the fear? If I can hear an argument taking place inside my own mind, with one part saying one thing and another answering back, am I either voice? Or is there something else present—something capable of watching them both?

The One Who Notices

Imagine that someone says something that irritates you. Almost instantly a response begins forming. Perhaps your body tightens. Maybe you feel something in your stomach or chest. Words begin assembling themselves in your mind. Normally we simply become the reaction. There is little separation between what is happening inside us and the person we believe ourselves to be. We don’t think, “Anger has appeared.” We think, “I am angry.” We don’t notice the defensive response forming. We simply begin defending ourselves.

But suppose something different happens. For just a moment, you notice it. Instead of immediately becoming the anger, you recognize, There is anger occurring within me.

That tiny change may seem insignificant, but I think it is enormous. The anger hasn’t disappeared. We haven’t suppressed it or pretended it isn’t there. We have simply become aware of it. In that instant there are now two things present: the reaction and the awareness of the reaction.

This is where the Fourth Way becomes much more than an interesting philosophy. It becomes something we can actually practice in ordinary life.

Which Part of Me Is Answering?

One question I have found particularly useful is, Which part of me is answering? Someone challenges us, criticizes us, disappoints us, or simply interferes with what we had planned. Immediately one of our inner characters steps forward. Perhaps it is the defender. Perhaps it is the wounded child. Perhaps it is the person who always needs to be right. Perhaps it is the frightened part that expects rejection, or the impatient part that simply wants the problem to go away.

These parts aren’t necessarily bad. Many developed for good reasons. Some may have protected us during difficult periods of our lives. Others learned ways of functioning that once served us well. The problem comes when one of them grabs the steering wheel without our even realizing it.

That is why another question becomes important: Can I see that part without becoming it?

There is a significant difference between saying, “I am angry,” and recognizing, “A part of me is angry.” In the first case, anger has become my entire identity for that moment. In the second, I have created just enough distance to observe it. I haven’t rejected the anger. I haven’t declared it wrong. I have simply stopped allowing it to define the whole of me.

The Space Between Impression and Response

Something interesting begins happening when we practice this kind of observation. A space appears. At first it may last only a second. Something happens, the reaction begins, and then we notice it. Within that tiny space lies the possibility of choice.

Perhaps we still say exactly what we were going to say. Perhaps we still become irritated. Perhaps the mechanical reaction wins the day. That doesn’t mean the practice has failed. The purpose isn’t perfection. The purpose is seeing.

Over time, however, that tiny space can become larger. Instead of immediately reacting, we may find ourselves able to receive the impression first. Something comes toward us from the outside world—a criticism, an inconvenience, an insult, a disappointment—and rather than instantly sending a reaction back, we allow ourselves to experience what is happening within us.

We notice the tightening in the stomach. We hear the words forming in the mind. We recognize the familiar emotional pattern. And instead of automatically obeying it, we wait.

Then we decide whether anything actually needs to be done.

Sometimes the conscious response may be to speak. Sometimes it may be to ask a question. Sometimes it may be to walk away. And sometimes the most conscious response may be no response at all. The important difference is that the response comes after awareness rather than before it.

The Observer Can Become Another King

There is a trap here worth recognizing. We can easily turn the observer itself into another character. We might begin thinking, “I am the enlightened one who watches all these foolish parts of myself.” If that happens, we haven’t escaped the problem at all. We have simply crowned another king.

True observation seems much quieter than that. It doesn’t brag. It doesn’t condemn. It doesn’t congratulate itself for being spiritual. It simply sees.

There is actually a kind of humility that develops through genuine self-observation, because the more honestly we watch ourselves, the more clearly we discover how mechanical we can be. We begin noticing reactions that have probably repeated themselves hundreds or even thousands of times. We see the same defenses, the same fears, the same arguments, and the same emotional patterns appearing again and again.

Strangely enough, that realization doesn’t have to be discouraging. It can be liberating, because what we can see clearly no longer has quite the same power to control us unconsciously.

What Is on the Throne?

This brings us back to the central image behind this entire series: Get the King Out of the Garden. The garden represents this inner field of consciousness where thoughts, emotions, memories, desires, fears, habits, and impressions constantly arise. And there are plenty of candidates for king.

Fear wants the throne. Pride wants the throne. Anger wants the throne. The wounded child occasionally wants the throne. The need to be admired wants the throne. Even our religious beliefs can climb onto the throne if we become more concerned with defending what we believe than discovering what is true.

But perhaps the goal isn’t merely to remove a false king. Perhaps we also need to discover what belongs there.

For me, the higher King points toward that deepest God-oriented center within us—the place that seeks truth, conscience, love, humility, awareness, and genuine understanding. It isn’t meant to replace Christ or remove Him from His throne. Quite the opposite. It reminds me of Jesus’ instruction to seek first the Kingdom of God. Perhaps part of seeking that Kingdom involves learning to recognize what has been ruling us instead.

That is why self-observation isn’t merely psychological housekeeping. It can become spiritual work. Each time we notice what is attempting to take the throne, we have an opportunity to ask whether that part should actually be ruling the garden.

Who Is Watching?

Eventually the question becomes deeper than a Fourth Way exercise. If I can observe my thoughts, perhaps I am more than my thoughts. If I can observe my emotions, perhaps I am more than my emotions. If I can observe my body growing older, perhaps I am more than the changing condition of my body.

I can remember the frightened child I once was, the teenager I once was, the young man I once was, and all the other versions of myself that have appeared throughout this lifetime. My body has changed enormously. My circumstances have changed. My beliefs have changed. My understanding has changed. Some things I once considered absolutely certain I no longer believe at all.

Yet through all those changes, something remarkable seems to remain.

There has been a continuity of awareness.

There has always been this mysterious experience of simply being me—the one looking out through these eyes.

That raises questions the Fourth Way itself may not completely answer. What exactly is this awareness? Where does it come from? Is consciousness produced entirely by the physical brain, or does it run deeper? And if nearly everything I normally identify as “myself” can be observed, then who is the observer?

I don’t pretend to have a final answer. In fact, I increasingly wonder whether rushing to an answer sometimes prevents us from experiencing the question.

Subscribe now

Practicing the Question

During the next few days, when a strong reaction appears, don’t immediately try to change it. Just notice it. Feel where it appears in the body. Listen to the thoughts accompanying it. Notice how quickly one particular part of you wants to take control of the situation.

Then quietly ask, Which part of me is answering?

After that, ask, Can I see this part without becoming it?

And finally, ask the question at the heart of this chapter:

Who is watching?

Don’t struggle to produce an intellectual answer. Remain with the question for a moment. Perhaps the answer isn’t something we think our way into. Perhaps it is something we gradually learn to experience.

And perhaps that quiet awareness—the part that can see the activity in the garden without immediately being swept away by it—is the beginning of discovering that we are considerably more than the collection of thoughts, emotions, habits, fears, and reactions we have spent a lifetime calling “me.”

Coming Next — Chapter 12: Remembering Yourself

Seeing ourselves is the beginning, but the Fourth Way speaks of something deeper called self-remembering. It is possible to be awake physically, functioning normally, talking, working, driving, even praying—and yet in another sense be asleep.

In the next chapter, we will explore what Gurdjieff meant by remembering ourselves, why it is different from merely thinking about ourselves, and how something as ordinary as washing dishes, walking across the yard, or having a conversation can become an exercise in awakening.

If you are joining us here you may wish to start at chapter 1 or go back to chapter 9.

One of the strangest discoveries in self-observation is that seeing something within ourselves does not necessarily mean we are free from it. We may recognize anger, fear, pride, worry, resentment, or the need to be right, yet a moment later find ourselves completely caught in it. There is a difference between having an emotion and becoming identified with the emotion. That difference may seem small at first, but it lies near the heart of the work we have been exploring.

Imagine that someone says something that irritates you. At first there may simply be an impression: words enter your ears, the face of the other person is before you, and something begins to stir inside. Perhaps there is tightening in the abdomen or shoulders. A thought appears: That isn’t fair. Another quickly follows: They shouldn’t talk to me that way. Within seconds, an entire inner story can form. We are no longer simply observing irritation. We have entered it.

At that point we don’t usually think, There is irritation occurring within me. We think, I am irritated. We don’t notice that fear is appearing; we simply say, I am afraid. We don’t recognize that a part of us wants to prove that it is right; instead, we become the one who must be right. This is what the Fourth Way calls identification.

The Disappearing Observer

Identification is so ordinary that we rarely recognize it. Something captures our attention, and for a time it becomes our entire world. The observing presence that we have been developing seems to disappear. Consider how easily this happens while listening to the news, watching a political discussion, arguing with someone we love, worrying about money, receiving criticism, or remembering something painful from years ago. The event itself may be relatively small, but internally it becomes enormous. Our attention contracts around it.

When this happens, one of the many selves we discussed earlier has effectively stepped onto the throne. It might be the offended self, the frightened self, the part that needs recognition, the part that wants control, or the part that cannot tolerate being wrong. For those few minutes—or sometimes hours or days—that particular self may speak as though it represents our entire being. The remarkable thing is that, while we are identified with it, we usually believe that it does.

The King Has Left the Throne

This brings us again to the image at the center of this series: Who is sitting on the throne? We have already seen that the different parts of ourselves are not necessarily enemies. Emotion has a proper function. Intellect has a proper function. Instinct protects us, and the moving center allows us to act. Ambition can accomplish things, caution can keep us from unnecessary danger, and even fear can sometimes warn us of something important. Each of these lesser kings has its place.

The trouble begins when a lesser king forgets that it is a servant and declares itself sovereign. Identification is one of the ways this happens. An emotion rises, and instead of being something we experience, it becomes the ruler of the Garden. A thought appears, and instead of being examined, it becomes truth. Fear speaks, and suddenly every other voice is silenced. Nothing may have physically changed around us. What has changed is who occupies the throne of our attention.

The Space Between Impression and Response

This is why self-observation is so important. It begins to create something that mechanical life seldom gives us: space. Someone says something, an impression enters, and something begins moving within us. Then, perhaps only for a second, we see it. That second matters.

We may feel the tightening in the stomach before the angry words come out. We may notice ourselves preparing an argument before the other person has even finished speaking. We may recognize the desire to defend ourselves or notice the little rush of satisfaction that comes from imagining how we are going to prove someone wrong. None of these things needs to be condemned. They simply need to be seen.

That tiny moment of seeing creates the possibility of choice. Without awareness, life can follow an almost automatic sequence: an impression enters, a reaction occurs, and an action follows. But when awareness appears, something new becomes possible. The impression can be followed by awareness, then a pause, then discernment, and finally a conscious response.

The outward response may occasionally be exactly the same as it would have been before. We may still need to say no. We may still need to disagree. We may still need to defend a boundary or correct something that is wrong. The difference is that the response can now come from a different place within us.

Can I See It Without Becoming It?

One of the most useful questions we can carry into ordinary life is very simple: Can I see this part of myself without becoming it? If anger appears, can I feel the anger without immediately giving it authority? If fear appears, can I listen to what fear is telling me without automatically obeying it? If someone challenges one of my beliefs, can I notice the urge to defend myself without immediately becoming the defender?

This does not mean suppressing anything. Suppression says, I shouldn’t feel this. Observation says, This is what is here. Those are very different attitudes. We are not trying to throw anyone out of the Garden. We are learning to recognize who has entered it and whether that part should be given authority.

Subscribe now

The Body Often Knows First

There is another useful clue in this work: the body often recognizes identification before the mind does. The shoulders tighten, the stomach contracts, the jaw stiffens, breathing changes, or the heartbeat becomes more noticeable. We may lean forward, our voice may change, and something within us begins preparing for action before our thinking mind has completely understood what is happening.

These bodily sensations can gradually become bells of awareness. Instead of thinking, I shouldn’t be feeling this, we can become curious. What just happened inside me? Which part of me has awakened? What does it want? What is it afraid of? Does it really need to act? And perhaps most importantly, who is watching it?

That last question leads somewhere very interesting. If I can observe fear, then there is something within me that is not identical to the fear. If I can observe anger, there is something present that is not identical to the anger. If I can watch thoughts passing through my mind, perhaps I am not simply the thoughts themselves.

We do not need to rush to define what that observing presence is. In fact, it may be more valuable to experience it than to name it. This series is not asking the reader to accept another belief system. It is offering an experiment: come and see.

Progress Is Remembering Sooner

There is a temptation when beginning this kind of work to measure progress by how peaceful we become. We imagine that if we were truly growing, anger would disappear, fear would disappear, irritation would disappear, and nothing would disturb us. But perhaps there is a much more realistic way to measure progress: How soon did I remember?

Perhaps in the past we remained angry for three days before recognizing what had happened. Later we notice after three hours. Eventually we notice after three minutes. Then one day, in the middle of a conversation, we feel the reaction forming and recognize it before the words leave our mouth. The reaction may still be there, but something else is there too: awareness.

That is an enormous change. The Garden has not become empty, and the lesser kings have not vanished. They are beginning to be recognized before they seize the throne. Progress may not mean that we never become identified again. It may simply mean that we awaken from identification sooner.

A Practice for This Week

During the coming days, don’t try to stop yourself from becoming identified. That can easily become another form of inner struggle. Instead, simply try to catch one moment of identification. It might happen while listening to the news, during a disagreement, while worrying about something that hasn’t happened, when someone criticizes you, or even when someone praises you.

Notice what happens in the body. Notice the thoughts that appear. Notice how quickly one part of you begins speaking as though it represents the whole of you. Then quietly ask yourself: Which part of me is answering? Can I see that part without becoming it? What is on the throne right now?

Do not be discouraged if you recognize the identification only afterward. That recognition itself is part of awakening. Yesterday we may not have seen it at all. Today we see it afterward. Tomorrow we may see it while it is happening. Eventually there may come that remarkable moment when an impression enters the Garden, a familiar king begins walking toward the throne—and someone is already there watching him come.

That is where mechanical reaction begins to lose some of its power, and it is where freedom quietly begins.

Coming Next — Chapter 11: Remembering Yourself

If self-observation allows us to see what is happening within us, another question soon arises: Who is doing the observing? In the next chapter, we will explore one of the most intriguing ideas in the Fourth Way—self-remembering—and why being aware of what we are doing is not necessarily the same thing as being aware that we are here while doing it.

A Note About This Series: During this series, it may seem that there is some repetition. This is intentional. These ideas are not meant simply to be understood intellectually, but gradually integrated into our everyday awareness. Repetition and reminders can help bring patterns that normally remain beneath conscious awareness into the surface mind, until observation becomes more natural and less something we have to strive to remember. Also, throughout these chapters, references to the lesser “king” or the king attempting to take the throne are generally referring to the ego and our mechanical reactions—not to Christ or the true spiritual King.

If this series speaks to you, consider sharing it with someone who may also be interested in exploring the inner life. These ideas are not offered as something you must believe, but as something you can test for yourself. Come and see.

Share

Leave a comment

If you are joining us here you may wish to start at chapter 1 or go back to chapter 8.

Most of us probably believe we make far more conscious decisions than we actually do. Something happens, someone says something, a memory surfaces, a problem appears, and almost instantly we respond. We become irritated, defensive, excited, frightened, offended, or determined. Because the response comes from within us, it feels as though we consciously decided how to respond. But when we begin watching ourselves more carefully, something rather remarkable appears. Much of the response was already underway before we consciously chose anything. An impression entered the Garden, and one of its inhabitants immediately began moving toward the throne.

This is one of the most useful discoveries we can make through self-observation. Between what happens to us and what we eventually do with it lies a territory we rarely notice. At first that territory may seem almost nonexistent. Someone criticizes us and irritation appears. Someone challenges something we believe, and an argument begins forming in our mind. We hear frightening news and anxiety rises in the body. The impression and the reaction seem to be one event, but they are not. Somewhere between them is a space. At first that space may last only a fraction of a second, yet as awareness grows, it can become larger. Within that small opening, something new becomes possible: choice.

Imagine someone saying something you believe is completely wrong. Perhaps they are talking about politics, religion, family, or something else you care deeply about. Before they have even finished speaking, another part of you may already be preparing the answer. The body can join in as well. The abdomen tightens, the shoulders rise, the heart beats a little faster, thoughts begin lining up arguments, and an emotional reaction starts gathering strength. One part wants to correct the person. Another may want to prove that you are right. None of these movements are necessarily bad. They are simply parts of our human machinery doing what they have learned to do.

The problem begins when one of them becomes king. If irritation takes the throne, irritation speaks. If pride takes the throne, pride speaks. If fear takes the throne, fear speaks. If the need to be right takes the throne, it may begin gathering evidence before the other person has even finished talking. Ordinarily, we experience all of these reactions simply as me. Self-observation introduces another possibility. Instead of immediately asking, What should I say? we can quietly ask, What is happening inside me right now? That small change of attention can alter the entire situation.

One of the practices I have increasingly found useful is simply allowing an impression to arrive before deciding what to do with it. That sounds easy, but our machinery is remarkably fast. Someone says something and the emotional center responds. The intellectual center begins constructing an argument. The instinctive center may sense danger or discomfort. The moving center may already be changing our posture or preparing us to speak. The whole inner government can mobilize within seconds. Yet awareness can begin to notice that mobilization. There may be a sensation in the abdomen, tension in the shoulders, a sudden emotional charge, or simply a thought saying, I need to answer this. When we notice it, another possibility appears: maybe I don’t have to answer immediately. I can receive the impression first.

I have found this especially interesting when listening to podcasts, news programs, interviews, or discussions where people express opinions very different from my own. These situations can become a kind of practice laboratory. An opinion enters, something inside reacts, and instead of immediately following the reaction, I can watch it. Sometimes I can almost feel the response forming before the words would come out. At other times the reaction is more physical, perhaps a sensation in the abdomen or a subtle tightening somewhere in the body. The interesting part is no longer merely whether the other person is right or wrong. The more revealing question becomes: What is happening inside me because I heard it?

That changes the entire exercise. The other person is no longer simply someone whose opinion I must accept, reject, or defeat. Without knowing it, that person has given me an opportunity to see my own machinery. Friction becomes information. A disagreement that once would have been entirely about the other person can become a mirror showing me something about myself.

Subscribe now

There is an important distinction here. Observing a reaction does not mean suppressing it. If anger appears, pretending we are not angry is not consciousness. If fear appears, pushing it down does not make us free from fear. If we disagree with someone, remaining silent is not automatically wisdom. The purpose of the pause is not to become passive. The purpose is to become less mechanical. There are times when we should speak strongly, times when boundaries need to be established, times when injustice should be challenged, and times when leaving a situation may be wiser than remaining in it. But there is a tremendous difference between consciously choosing an action and being pushed into it by whichever part of us happens to seize the throne.

This brings us back to one of the most practical questions in this entire journey: Which part of me is answering? Is it fear, pride, compassion, embarrassment, the need for approval, the need to win, a wounded memory, or simply habit? Or is there something quieter underneath all of these? Sometimes merely asking the question loosens our identification with the reaction. Instead of saying, I am angry, we begin to notice, Anger is present. Instead of thinking, I have to defend myself, we notice, Something in me feels the need to defend itself. That may appear to be only a small change in language, but inwardly it represents something much larger. We have moved a few inches away from the throne, and from those few inches we can begin to see who is sitting there.

I once thought spiritual growth should eventually eliminate many of these reactions. I am no longer convinced that is the best way to measure progress. Perhaps the more meaningful measure is how quickly we remember ourselves after a reaction begins. At first we may become angry and remember hours later. Later we remember after twenty minutes. Eventually it may be thirty seconds. Then one day we catch the reaction while it is actually forming. The reaction may still arise, but now someone is watching.

This is why progress in self-observation can be difficult to recognize. We may still experience fear, irritation, pride, anxiety, or defensiveness and conclude that nothing has changed. Yet something may have changed enormously: we are remembering sooner. Reaction becomes awareness, awareness creates a pause, the pause allows discernment, and discernment makes a conscious response possible. Sometimes that response will be speaking. Sometimes it will be acting. Sometimes it will be setting a boundary. And sometimes the most conscious response will be no response at all.

There is another interesting thing we may begin to notice. The lesser kings within us often speak with great urgency. Fear says, Do something. Pride says, Correct them. Anger says, Strike back. Anxiety says, Fix this immediately. The need for approval says, Make them understand you. Yet the deeper center within us seems to have a different quality. It does not always need to shout. It can wait. It can observe. It can receive an impression without immediately becoming that impression.

Perhaps there is an echo here of Jesus’ repeated invitations to watch, listen, and develop eyes to see and ears to hear. There is a quality of attention that comes before action. We normally think freedom means being able to do whatever we want, but perhaps there is a deeper freedom: the freedom not to obey every impulse that arises within us.

During the coming days, we can experiment with something very simple. Watch for one moment when an event, statement, memory, or opinion produces an immediate reaction. Don’t try to stop the reaction, judge it, or even analyze where it came from. Simply notice it. If possible, notice where it appears in the body. Then quietly ask, Which part of me is answering? Can I receive this impression before I respond to it? You may ultimately give exactly the same response you would have given before, and that is perfectly all right. The important difference is that this time you may have been present when the decision was made.

That tiny difference may be one of the beginnings of genuine inner freedom. The Garden will always receive impressions. Thoughts will arise, emotions will move, instinct will protect, memories will speak, and different selves will continue walking through its gates. We do not need to drive them out. Each has its place. What we are learning is not to hand every visitor the crown.

Every time we create even a few seconds between an impression and our response, the throne becomes a little less available to whichever part happens to rush toward it first. Perhaps this is one way the true King gradually returns to the Garden—not through force, but through attention.

Coming Next in chapter 10:

In the next chapter, we will look more closely at identification—what happens when we become so absorbed in a thought, emotion, role, belief, or problem that we temporarily lose our ability to see it. The most powerful king in the Garden may sometimes be the one we don’t realize we have become.

If this series has given you something worth thinking about, consider sharing it with someone who might enjoy exploring these questions with us. Sometimes one thoughtful conversation is enough to help another person begin looking inward.

A Note About This Series: During this series, it may seem that there is some repetition. This is intentional. These ideas are not meant simply to be understood intellectually, but gradually integrated into our everyday awareness. Repetition and reminders can help bring patterns that normally remain beneath conscious awareness into the surface mind, until observation becomes more natural and less something we have to strive to remember. Also, throughout these chapters, references to the lesser “king” or the king attempting to take the throne are generally referring to the ego and our mechanical reactions—not to Christ or the true spiritual King.

Share

Leave a comment

If you are starting here you may wish to go back to chapter 1

In the last chapter, we looked at the Jack, Queen, and King as a way of recognizing different levels of activity within our centers. The purpose was never to turn ourselves into a deck of cards. The cards are only a temporary map—a way to begin recognizing something that normally happens too quickly for us to see. Once we begin seeing it, the map becomes less important. We start noticing the actual movement within ourselves.

And that brings us to perhaps the most important moment in this entire work.

Something happens. We receive an impression. Someone says something we do not like. We hear an opinion that conflicts with our own. A driver pulls out in front of us. Someone criticizes us. An unexpected bill arrives. We read a troubling headline. A family member speaks sharply. Before we realize what has happened, something within us has already begun responding. The body tightens, an emotion rises, thoughts appear, and words begin forming. We may even be speaking before we are consciously aware that a decision has been made.

Most of the time, there seems to be no space between what happens to us and what comes out of us. But there is. Learning to find that space may be one of the beginnings of genuine freedom.

The Impression Comes First

Everything begins with an impression. Something enters our awareness through sight, sound, memory, imagination, sensation, or thought. The impression itself may last only a fraction of a second, but almost immediately our inner machinery begins working on it.

Imagine that someone says, “I think you’re completely wrong about that.” Those are simply words. They enter through the ears as an impression, but they rarely remain merely words. Almost instantly, something inside begins interpreting them. Perhaps the emotional center hears rejection. The intellectual center begins assembling arguments. The instinctive center senses threat. The moving center prepares the body as muscles tighten, posture changes, and perhaps the face hardens. One of our familiar selves steps forward and says, in effect, I’ll handle this.

Before long, we are no longer receiving the impression. We are reacting to our interpretation of it. This can happen so quickly that we experience the whole sequence as one event: He insulted me, so I became angry. Yet when we observe carefully, we begin discovering that several things happened between those two points. There was the impression, followed by an interpretation. The body responded, an emotion arose, thoughts appeared, an impulse to act developed, and finally there was the action. Normally these occur almost as one movement. Self-observation begins to slow the process down enough for us to see its parts.

Reaction Is Fast—Awareness Is Quiet

Mechanical reactions are fast because they have been practiced thousands of times. We do not have to think about them. Someone pushes the right button and the familiar program runs. The need to defend ourselves may appear, or the need to explain, prove that we are right, withdraw, strike back, please someone, worry, or control the situation.

None of these reactions necessarily makes us bad people. Many developed for understandable reasons, and some once served important purposes. The problem begins when they operate without our awareness and automatically occupy the throne.

That is why this work is not primarily about suppressing reactions. If anger rises, pretending we are not angry accomplishes little. If fear arises, condemning ourselves for being afraid merely adds another layer of reaction. The first task is much simpler: see it.

Instead of immediately saying, I am angry, we might begin noticing, Something in me is becoming angry. Instead of I have to defend myself, we might recognize, Something in me wants to defend itself. We might notice fear arising or recognize that something within us needs to be right. The anger, fear, or defensiveness is still real. We are not denying it. But we are no longer completely fused with it.

Someone is watching.

That small change connects directly with the question we have been exploring throughout this series: Which part of me is answering?

The Sacred Pause

Between an impression and our response, there can be a pause. At first it may be extremely small—perhaps no more than one conscious breath—but that breath can change everything.

Someone says something irritating. You feel the tightening in your abdomen or chest. A reply immediately appears in your mind, and normally it would come straight out of your mouth. But this time you notice. You do not immediately suppress the reply, and you do not immediately express it. You simply receive the impression and, for perhaps two seconds, remain present.

Those two seconds may not look very impressive from the outside, but inwardly something remarkable has happened. The mechanical chain has been interrupted. A reaction arose, but it was seen before it became action. This is where choice begins.

The Fourth Way sometimes speaks of remembering oneself. Christian language might describe something similar as becoming watchful, sober, awake, or attentive to what is moving within the heart. Jesus repeatedly called people to watchfulness, and James advised being quick to hear and slow to speak and to anger. These teachings become very practical when we realize how quickly our inner reactions normally seize control.

The pause creates an opening in which another question can appear: Do I want to obey this reaction?

That is very different from asking whether the reaction is justified. The ego can produce a courtroom full of evidence proving why it deserves to react. The better question is whether this particular inner voice should be ruling us at this moment.

The Lesser King Wants Immediate Authority

This brings us back to the image of the garden and the throne. There are many legitimate functions within us. Intellect should think. Emotion should feel. Instinct should protect. The moving center should act. Caution, ambition, confidence, anger, fear, and even the desire to defend ourselves may sometimes have useful roles.

Each king has its place, but every king is not entitled to the throne.

When we react mechanically, one of these lesser kings often grabs authority before we even realize an election has taken place. Fear says, I am in charge now. Anger says, Move aside. Pride says, I’ll answer this. Hurt says, I know exactly what this means. The pause gives us time to notice the takeover and ask: Which king is ruling right now—and is that the king I truly want to serve?

For the purposes of this journey, the higher King points toward that deepest God-oriented center within us where truth, conscience, love, humility, and awareness begin coming together. For Christians, this does not mean replacing Christ on the throne of our being. Quite the opposite. The work is learning to recognize the ego and the mechanical parts that continually attempt to take authority that does not belong to them.

Self-observation does not crown the observer. It exposes the pretenders.

Receiving Before Responding

One of the simplest practices we can begin using is to receive the impression first. This sounds almost ridiculously simple, yet it can be surprisingly difficult.

Can we listen to someone’s entire sentence without preparing our answer? Can we notice an unpleasant emotion without immediately explaining why we are entitled to it? Can we feel tension in the body before trying to remove it? Can we encounter an opposing opinion without instantly deciding what kind of person would believe such a thing? Can we notice fear before constructing a story about what might happen?

For a moment, just receive what has arrived.

This does not mean becoming passive. Sometimes a strong response is exactly what a situation requires. Boundaries may need to be established. An injustice may need to be confronted. A dangerous situation may require immediate action. Conscious living does not mean becoming harmless in the sense of being incapable of decisive action. The difference is that action increasingly comes from discernment rather than compulsion.

There is a tremendous difference between anger using us and consciously using the energy of anger to address something that needs correction. One is possession. The other is stewardship.

The Body Often Knows First

As we practice, we may discover that the body gives us an early warning that a mechanical reaction is forming. The jaw may tighten, the shoulders rise, the stomach contract, breathing change, the heart speed up, heat appear in the face, or the hands tense. These sensations can become valuable signals. Instead of seeing them as inconveniences, we can treat them almost like a bell calling us back to ourselves.

Something is happening in me.

That is the moment to become interested rather than judgmental. Where do I feel it? What emotion is connected with it? What thoughts are appearing? What does this part of me want to do? And perhaps most importantly: Can I allow this impression to exist for a moment without immediately becoming it?

That question begins moving us beyond the playing cards. We no longer necessarily have to think, This is the Queen of Hearts or This is the Jack of Clubs. Eventually we simply recognize the movement directly—fear, defensiveness, pride, hurt, compassion, reason. The map has served its purpose. We are beginning to see the territory.

Freedom Does Not Mean Having No Reactions

We should also be careful about how we measure progress. The goal is not to reach some imaginary state in which nothing ever bothers us. That can easily become another spiritual ego: A truly conscious person would never become irritated. That is not the point.

Progress may simply mean that we remember sooner. At first, we may react and recognize it an hour later. Eventually it may be ten minutes later. Then we notice while we are still reacting. Later we may catch the reaction just before speaking. And occasionally something extraordinary happens: we see the entire movement arise and choose not to follow it.

The external situation may be exactly the same, but something within us has changed. The old self appeared. It simply was not given the keys to the kingdom.

A Simple Practice for This Week

During the coming week, there is no need to attempt this with every moment of the day. Choose ordinary situations. When you notice a reaction beginning, remember this simple movement: Reaction → Awareness → Pause → Discernment → Response.

Notice what is happening in the body, emotion, and mind. Pause, even if only for one breath. Ask which part of you wants to respond. Then choose whether to speak, act, wait, or perhaps do nothing at all.

Do not worry about getting it right. In fact, some of the most useful observations will come when you completely forget the practice and react mechanically. When you remember afterward, look back without condemning yourself. See what happened. What was the first sensation? Which thought followed? Which part grabbed the throne?

Every time we see the mechanism more clearly, we become a little less imprisoned by it. The victory is not perfection. The victory is awakening.

The Doorway to Conscious Living

We began this series by asking how we might move beyond the conditioning and programming that have shaped so much of our lives. The answer is not found merely by acquiring more spiritual information. We can read hundreds of books and still react exactly as we always have.

Transformation begins in moments that seem almost insignificant: a breath before answering, a sensation noticed in the abdomen, an angry thought seen rather than spoken, a judgment recognized before it becomes condemnation, or a moment when we realize, There is that part of me again.

And then comes the quiet question: Does it need to rule?

That tiny space between impression and response may be one of the most important places in the garden, because that is where the throne becomes visible. And once we can see the throne, we can begin becoming much more careful about who we allow to sit upon it.

Coming Next

Chapter 9 — When We Become Identified

We will look at what happens when we become so absorbed in a thought, emotion, opinion, role, or grievance that we can no longer see it objectively—and why recognizing identification may be one of the keys to waking up.

If you are joining us here you may wish to start at chapter 1 or go back to chapter 7.

A Note About This Series: During this series, it may seem that there is some repetition. This is intentional. These ideas are not meant simply to be understood intellectually, but gradually integrated into our everyday awareness. Repetition and reminders can help bring patterns that normally remain beneath conscious awareness into the surface mind, until observation becomes more natural and less something we have to strive to remember. Also, throughout these chapters, references to the lesser “king” or the king attempting to take the throne are generally referring to the ego and our mechanical reactions—not to Christ or the true spiritual King.

Share

Leave a comment

If you are starting here you may wish to go back to chapter 1

In the last chapter, we introduced an ordinary deck of playing cards as a simple way of recognizing some of the different parts operating within us. Clubs represented the instinctive center, Spades the moving or doing center, Hearts the emotional center, and Diamonds the part of us concerned with values, meaning, judgment, and what we consider important. The purpose was never to give ourselves another system to memorize. The cards are only a temporary map—a way of making something normally invisible a little easier to see. Eventually, we should be able to put the cards aside and simply recognize what is happening within ourselves as it happens.

But recognizing the center that is operating is only part of the picture. The same center can operate very differently depending upon our level of awareness. An emotion can explode instantly, overwhelm us completely, or be experienced with enough attention that we can choose what to do with it. An instinct can produce an automatic reaction, become a powerful fear or desire, or provide useful information without taking control of us. Thought itself can chatter mechanically, become absorbed in an idea, or quietly examine something with genuine attention. This brings us to another useful part of our playing-card picture: the Jack, Queen, and King.

The Jack — Life on Automatic

Think of the Jack as the most mechanical expression of a center. Something happens, and the Jack responds almost immediately. There is very little space between the impression and the reaction. Someone criticizes us, and we defend ourselves. Someone cuts us off in traffic and irritation appears. The telephone rings and our hand reaches for it almost before we have consciously decided to answer. We hear an opinion we disagree with and begin forming our rebuttal before the other person has finished speaking.

There is nothing inherently bad about the Jack. In fact, much of life requires automatic functioning. We could hardly drive a car if we had to consciously think through every movement of our hands and feet. Our instinctive center constantly regulates processes that would be impossible to manage consciously. Habits make ordinary life possible. The problem begins when an automatic response takes charge in a situation that requires awareness.

Imagine hearing something that challenges one of your long-held beliefs. Before you have really examined what was said, an inner voice announces, That cannot be right. That may be the intellectual Jack protecting an established idea. Or perhaps someone speaks sharply to you, and you immediately feel the need to strike back. The emotional Jack has already drawn its sword. The response may occur so quickly that we experience it simply as me. We do not say, “A reaction has arisen within me.” We say, “I am angry,” “I am offended,” or “I know this is wrong.”

Self-observation begins to change that.

Instead of immediately becoming the reaction, we begin to notice it. Something in me wants to answer right now. That tiny recognition is enormously important. For perhaps the first time, the Jack has been seen.

The Queen — When the Center Gains Power

The Queen represents something different. Here the energy of the center has become stronger and more developed. The experience is not merely an automatic flicker; it can fill our inner world. In the emotional center, for example, the Jack may snap at someone almost automatically, while the Queen may become deeply absorbed in anger, excitement, sorrow, affection, fear, or enthusiasm. The emotion has gathered force.

Again, this is not necessarily bad. Imagine trying to live without powerful emotion. There would be no deep compassion, no profound appreciation of beauty, no passionate love, no exhilaration, and very little of what gives human life richness. The Queen has tremendous energy.

But tremendous energy can also capture us.

We have all experienced moments when an emotion became so strong that it seemed unquestionably true simply because we felt it intensely. Fear can make danger appear greater than it is. Anger can convince us that another person deserves whatever judgment we place upon them. Excitement can make an idea seem far better than careful examination later reveals. The Queen does not merely react; she can become identified with the experience.

The same principle can appear in the other centers. The moving center may become absorbed in constant activity, unable to sit still because doing has become its identity. The instinctive center may magnify discomfort, security, appetite, or self-preservation until those concerns dominate everything else. Even our values can become intensified until something we genuinely treasure turns into rigidity: This is important to me, therefore everyone else should see it the same way.

The Fourth Way asks us to do something unusual here. We do not suppress the Queen, and we do not surrender the throne to her. We observe her.

That may mean feeling an emotion fully without immediately acting upon it. It may mean allowing discomfort to be present without automatically escaping it. It may mean noticing our enthusiasm for an idea while still asking whether the idea is actually true.

We receive the impression first.

Then we respond.

The King — Attention Enters the Picture

The King represents a center functioning with greater balance and attention. The emotion is still there. The instinct is still there. Thought is still operating. Action is still possible. But something has changed: we are present with it.

Suppose someone says something that angers us. The Jack may immediately retaliate. The Queen may become consumed by the anger. But the King of Hearts can feel the anger without immediately becoming its servant. He might notice the tightening in the abdomen, the change in breathing, the desire to answer sharply, and the thoughts beginning to assemble a defense. None of those things have to disappear. The difference is that attention has entered the experience.

Now there is space.

That space does not guarantee that we will make the perfect decision. Conscious living is not about becoming infallible. It simply gives us something mechanical living does not: choice.

Perhaps we still decide that something needs to be said. But now the response can come from discernment rather than reflex. Perhaps we realize that no response is necessary at all. Sometimes one of the most conscious things we can do is allow another person’s words to pass through the moment without giving them additional energy.

This is why progress in self-observation may be far less dramatic than we imagine. At first, we recognize the reaction an hour later: I really became identified with that. Eventually we recognize it five minutes later. Then perhaps while it is happening. Finally, there may be moments when we see it arising before it takes possession of us.

That is genuine change.

We are remembering ourselves sooner.

Subscribe now

But Even the Kings Are Not the King

Here we arrive at an important distinction, especially considering the title of this series.

There can be a King of Hearts, a King of Clubs, a King of Spades, and a King of Diamonds. Each represents a center functioning intelligently and with greater awareness. Yet none of these lesser kings should occupy the supreme throne.

The intellect has an important job, but intellect alone should not rule our entire life. Emotion is essential, but emotion should not become the absolute monarch. Instinct protects the organism, but survival and comfort cannot determine every choice. The moving center allows us to act in the world, but endless activity is not the same as meaningful living. Even our values must remain open to deeper truth, because we can sincerely value something and still be mistaken.

Each king has his place, but each is subordinate to the King we ultimately place into office.

For the purposes of this journey, that higher King points toward the deepest God-oriented center within us—the place where truth, conscience, love, humility, and awareness begin to come together. Christians may recognize an echo of Jesus’ teaching about seeking first the Kingdom of God. The image is not of destroying our human faculties but of bringing them into their proper relationship. This is not meant to remove Christ from His rightful place in our lives. For the purpose of this teaching, our focus is on the ego—the lesser parts of ourselves that so easily take the throne—and learning how to observe them.

The intellect should think.

Emotion should feel.

Instinct should protect.

The moving center should act.

But none should seize the throne and declare itself the whole of who we are.

Perhaps this gives new meaning to the question that has been following us through this series:

Which king is ruling right now—and is that the king I truly want to serve?

Try Watching the Court

During the coming week, we can experiment with this without trying to analyze every moment of the day. Simply choose occasions when something within you becomes noticeable. Maybe someone disagrees with you. Maybe plans suddenly change. Perhaps you feel anxious, excited, irritated, impatient, or unusually determined to accomplish something.

First ask: Which suit is active?

Is this primarily instinctive? Moving? Emotional? Is it connected with values or something I consider especially important?

Then ask another question: Is this the Jack, Queen, or King?

Am I reacting automatically? Am I becoming swept up in the energy of the center? Or can I remain present enough to experience what is happening without immediately becoming it?

Do not worry about getting the classification exactly right. The purpose is not to become an expert card player of the psyche. The purpose is to catch that remarkable moment when we realize:

This is happening within me, but I do not have to become it.

That realization creates a small opening between stimulus and response. And in that opening, another possibility appears.

The King may enter the Garden.

Not by force. Not by defeating every other part of ourselves. Not by banishing the Jack or dethroning every Queen. They all have functions, and they all belong within the kingdom.

The work is simply to recognize them, give them their proper place, and stop allowing whichever one happens to shout the loudest to automatically sit upon the throne.

Perhaps that is where freedom begins—not when nothing inside us reacts, but when we finally become conscious enough to notice who is reacting before we hand them the crown.

Coming Next

Chapter 8 — The Moment Between Impression and Response

We will look more closely at that tiny inner space where self-observation can interrupt a mechanical reaction—and where genuine choice first becomes possible.

Next

If you are joning here you may wish to start at chapter 1 or the previous chapter 6.

During this series, it may seem that there is some repetition. This is on purpose so we can integrate this a little better, as constant reminders help our subconscious come to the surface mind and become a habit rather than a striving. The king references will refer to our ego.

Share

Leave a comment

If you are joining us here you may with to go to chapter 1 or the previous chapter 5.

In the last chapter, we looked at what happens when one of our inner centers takes the throne and begins ruling the whole person. The intellect may decide that everything must be analyzed. Emotion may become offended and demand a response. Instinct may sense danger and immediately prepare us to defend ourselves. The moving center may simply begin doing what it has always done before we have consciously decided anything at all. None of these centers is bad. Each has an important place in our inner life. The problem begins when a servant becomes the king.

But knowing that we have different centers is one thing. Actually recognizing them while they are operating is quite another.

That is where a simple deck of playing cards can become surprisingly useful.

The cards are not magical, and there is nothing sacred about the symbols themselves. We are going to use them as a temporary language—a way of putting names and pictures around inner movements that usually happen too quickly for us to notice. Eventually we may no longer need the cards at all. The goal is not to become an expert at labeling ourselves. The goal is to become better at seeing ourselves.

Four Suits, Four Ways of Responding

Imagine that four suits represent four broad ways through which we meet life.

Clubs represent the instinctive or autonomic part of us. This is the part concerned with the body, comfort, safety, survival, health, physical sensations, appetite, tension, and many of the automatic processes that keep us alive. You touch a hot stove and withdraw your hand before thinking about it. You hear an unexpected crash in the night, and your body becomes alert. Someone confronts you aggressively, and you may feel your stomach tighten before a single thought has formed. The Club has already responded.

There is nothing wrong with this. We need this center. Without it, we could not survive. But imagine what happens when the Club becomes king. Ordinary uncertainty may begin to look like danger. A bodily sensation may dominate our attention. The desire for comfort may make our decisions for us. We may resist something simply because it feels unfamiliar. The servant who was designed to protect the organism begins deciding how the whole person should live.

Spades represent the moving or doing part of us. This is the part that knows how to act, build, walk, drive, work, type, mow the lawn, operate machinery, play an instrument, or perform the thousands of learned movements we rarely think about. It is wonderfully efficient. Imagine having to consciously decide which muscles to move every time you walk across a room. We would accomplish very little.

But the same ability that makes movement efficient also allows us to live much of life on autopilot. We may begin talking before we know what we want to say. We reach for the phone without deciding to. We follow the same routine because it is what we have always done. We respond to a familiar situation with a familiar behavior simply because the pathway has been traveled so many times before. The Spade is an excellent worker, but it should not determine the direction of our lives simply because it knows the road.

Hearts represent the emotional center. Through this center we experience affection, anger, joy, disappointment, compassion, resentment, excitement, embarrassment, grief, tenderness, jealousy, gratitude, and the enormous range of human feeling. Emotion gives color and depth to life. It allows us to connect with another person’s suffering, delight in beauty, love our family, and feel the presence of something larger than ourselves.

Emotion can also sweep us away.

Someone makes a comment, and suddenly we are offended. A person disagrees with something we deeply believe, and we feel an immediate need to correct them. Someone praises us and our entire mood changes. Someone ignores us, and another mood appears. In these moments, the emotional center may not merely be informing us about what we feel. It may be climbing onto the throne and announcing, “Because I feel this strongly, it must be true.”

Yet a strong feeling and truth are not necessarily the same thing.

Finally, Diamonds represent what we value—what seems important, significant, desirable, meaningful, or special to us. This can include money and possessions, but it reaches much deeper than that. Reputation can be a Diamond. Our beliefs can become Diamonds. Being respected can be a Diamond. Our family, position, accomplishments, knowledge, identity, or spiritual understanding can all carry special value.

This may be the trickiest suit of all because we often do not recognize how strongly our sense of value shapes what we see. Suppose someone questions something we believe. The words themselves may be harmless, yet if that belief has become part of our identity, the Diamond feels threatened. Almost instantly, the Heart may become emotional, the Club may tighten the body, the intellect may begin constructing a defense, and the Spade may prepare the mouth to answer.

Within seconds, the whole inner government can be mobilized.

And we may call all of it “me.”

Which Part of Me Is Answering?

This is where the cards begin to become useful.

Suppose someone says something that irritates me. Instead of immediately following the irritation, I might quietly ask, Which part of me is answering right now?

Is this primarily a Heart reaction? Am I hurt, offended, angry, or defensive?

Is a Diamond involved? Has something I value—perhaps my reputation, opinion, belief, or need to be right—been challenged?

Do I feel a Club reaction in the body? Is my stomach tightening? Are my shoulders becoming tense? Has my breathing changed?

Is the Spade already preparing to act—to interrupt, walk away, fire off an email, raise my voice, or explain myself?

Nothing has to be suppressed. In fact, suppression would defeat the purpose. We are not trying to stop ourselves from feeling. We are trying to see what is happening before it completely becomes us.

There is a remarkable difference between saying, “I am angry,” and observing, “Anger is arising in me.”

The first statement easily becomes an identity. The second leaves a little space.

And that little space is where the real work begins.

Subscribe now

The Cards Are Not Boxes

There is an important caution here. Human beings are far too complicated to fit neatly into four suits. Most reactions involve several centers operating together. The cards are not intended to turn people into personality types, and they certainly should not become another system for labeling everyone around us.

That would miss the entire point.

It would be very easy to learn this material and begin thinking, “ My wife is acting from Hearts. My neighbor is obviously a Diamond. That fellow on television is nothing but Clubs.

And suddenly we have created an elaborate new method of judging everyone except ourselves.

The Fourth Way continually turns our attention back toward the one person we can actually observe from the inside.

Me.

The question is not, Which card is that person?

The question is, Which card is operating in me right now?

This is why the system works best as a temporary teaching aid. At first we may need the labels. Eventually we begin recognizing the movements directly. We feel the tightening in the abdomen. We notice the emotional surge. We hear the internal argument beginning. We sense the urge to speak before we have consciously chosen to speak.

The card has done its job.

We have seen ourselves.

Creating a Space Between Impression and Response

Most of the time, life comes at us in the form of impressions. Someone speaks. A headline appears. A car pulls out in front of us. An unexpected bill arrives. Someone criticizes our work. A family member says something in the wrong tone.

The impression enters, and almost immediately something inside us reacts.

For most of our lives, those two events—impression and reaction—can seem like one thing.

Something happens.

We respond.

But self-observation begins to reveal a tiny interval between them.

At first we may recognize that interval only afterward. There I went again.

That is not failure. It is actually progress because yesterday we may not have seen it at all.

With practice, recognition begins arriving sooner. Instead of seeing the reaction an hour later, we see it ten minutes later. Eventually we may notice it thirty seconds later. Then perhaps while it is happening.

And occasionally something remarkable occurs.

We see it before we act.

The Heart rises.

The Club tightens.

The Diamond feels threatened.

The Spade prepares to respond.

And something deeper within us quietly notices the entire process.

For a moment, no servant has taken the throne.

There is simply awareness.

This is where our recurring question becomes powerful:

Which king is ruling right now—and is that the King I truly want to serve?

The purpose is not to destroy the other kings within us. Each has its place. Intellect should think. Emotion should feel. Instinct should protect. The moving center should act. Values should help orient our lives. But each must remain subordinate to the King we consciously put into office.

For me, that highest authority points toward truth, conscience, love, and ultimately God.

When that King is on the throne, the other parts of us do not disappear. They begin taking their proper places.

Emotion can still feel anger without anger deciding what happens next. Instinct can warn us without fear ruling the entire garden. Intellect can examine a problem without believing every thought it produces. The moving center can act without automatically repeating yesterday. Our values can guide us without demanding that everyone else value exactly what we do.

Perhaps this is one way of understanding what it means to return to the Garden—not by becoming innocent through ignorance, but by becoming conscious through understanding.

We are beginning to see what grows there.

A Simple Practice for This Week

Over the next several days, don’t worry about remembering every detail of the card system. Simply notice yourself during ordinary life.

When something produces a noticeable reaction, become curious.

What happened first?

Did you feel something in your body?

Did an emotion suddenly appear?

Did a thought begin explaining what the situation meant?

Did something you value feel threatened?

Did you immediately want to do or say something?

You do not have to correct any of it.

Just observe.

If you remember only after the reaction has passed, observe it afterward. If you recognize it halfway through, observe it then. If someday you see it just before responding, notice that too.

The goal is not perfection.

The goal is remembering sooner.

Because every time we remember, even briefly, the automatic king loses a little of its unquestioned authority.

And somewhere within the Garden, the rightful King begins to stir.

Coming Next — Chapter 7: The Jacks, Queens, and Kings Within Us

The four suits show us where a reaction may be coming from, but there is another dimension to the cards. A Jack, Queen, and King do not operate in the same way. In the next chapter, we will look at three different levels through which each center can express itself—from mechanical reaction, through powerful raw energy, toward attention and conscious response. This is where the card system begins to reveal something much deeper about the inner government of the Garden.

Next

During this series, it may seem that there is some repetition. This is on purpose so we can integrate this a little better, as constant reminders help our subconscious come to the surface mind and become a habit rather than a striving. The king references will refer to our ego.

If this series speaks to something you have been noticing within yourself, please consider sharing it with someone who may be asking the same questions. Sometimes one small observation can open a very large door.

Share

Leave a comment

In the last chapter, we looked at the different centers within us—the intellectual, emotional, instinctive, and moving centers—and considered the possibility that each has a legitimate purpose. The intellect is meant to think, emotion to feel, instinct to protect and regulate the body, and the moving center to carry out action. None of these is an enemy. Each belongs in the garden. The difficulty begins when one of them moves beyond its proper responsibility and begins governing areas of life for which it was never intended.

This happens far more often than we realize. Because the process is usually automatic, we simply experience the result as me. I am angry. I am worried. I know that person is wrong. I need to answer. I have to defend myself. I cannot let that comment go unanswered. There is seldom any awareness that a particular part of our inner machinery has seized control and recruited the other parts to support it. We might call this an inner coup—a lesser king has taken the throne.

When Emotion Hires the Intellect

One of the easiest examples to observe occurs when emotion reacts first and then recruits the intellect to justify what has already happened. Someone says something that irritates us. Perhaps we feel dismissed, criticized, embarrassed, or misunderstood. The emotional reaction may occur almost instantly. Sometimes the body registers it even before we consciously recognize the emotion—a tightening in the abdomen, tension in the shoulders, a change in breathing, or a sudden surge of energy.

Then thought begins. But the thinking that follows may not be neutral investigation. The intellectual center has been hired by the emotional center as its attorney, and it immediately begins building a case. They always do this. They don’t respect me. I know exactly why they said that. Someone needs to straighten them out.

The mind searches its files for evidence supporting the emotion. It remembers earlier offenses while conveniently forgetting occasions that contradict the case. It invents motives, rehearses what we should say, and may even imagine future conversations in which we finally prove our point. We experience all of this as reasoning, but often the conclusion was reached before the reasoning began.

This is worth observing because intelligence does not necessarily protect us from mechanical behavior. In fact, a clever mind can sometimes make identification worse because it is extremely good at constructing convincing explanations for whatever the emotional center already wants to believe. This is one reason two intelligent people can disagree intensely, and both possess elaborate arguments proving that they are right. Neither may actually be observing the part of themselves that needs to be right.

The question therefore becomes more subtle than simply, “Is my argument correct?” We might also ask, “Who hired the lawyer?” That question can change everything.

When the Intellect Tries to Do the Impossible

The wrong king can take the throne in another direction as well. Sometimes the intellectual center tries to solve something that does not belong primarily to thought. Grief is a good example. If someone we love dies, the intellect may search endlessly for explanations. Why did this happen? Could something have been done differently? Why now? What does it mean? Some reflection may be useful, but grief itself cannot simply be reasoned away. There comes a point when the emotional center needs permission to feel what it feels.

We do something similar with uncertainty. The mind believes that if it thinks long enough, it can somehow remove uncertainty from life, so it keeps working. At two o’clock in the morning, it reviews tomorrow’s problems, rehearses conversations that have not happened, predicts what another person might do, and constructs possibilities that may never occur. Then, remarkably, we begin responding emotionally to the very possibilities our own mind has created.

The intellect has become king, but it is ruling a territory it cannot control. This can create an interesting cycle. Thought produces a frightening possibility. The instinctive center reacts physically. Emotion experiences anxiety. The intellect notices the anxiety and decides the situation must therefore be serious, so it produces even more frightening thoughts. Round and round the kingdom goes. Nothing outside us may have changed, yet inside, an entire emergency has been created.

Again, the problem is not thinking. Thinking is extraordinarily valuable when there is something useful to think about. The problem is failing to recognize when thought has completed its legitimate work and has begun running mechanically. Sometimes wisdom consists simply of recognizing: There is nothing more I can solve right now. That recognition itself may be an act of consciousness.

When Instinct Treats an Opinion Like a Tiger

The instinctive center presents another fascinating example because its reactions can be extremely fast. Its responsibility includes survival, bodily protection, comfort, pain avoidance, and countless automatic functions. When genuine danger appears, we are grateful that the body does not wait for a committee meeting before responding. But this same protective machinery can become attached to psychological threats as well.

Someone challenges our opinion, questions our competence, disagrees with our religious belief, or criticizes something we have done. There may be no physical danger whatsoever, yet the body responds as though something important is under attack. The stomach tightens, the pulse changes, and the muscles prepare for action. Why? Because the personality may experience threats to identity almost as though they were threats to survival.

This is especially interesting to observe around beliefs with which we strongly identify. If someone disagrees with an idea we merely hold, we can usually discuss it calmly. But when an idea has become part of who we believe ourselves to be, disagreement can produce an entirely different reaction. The instinctive center sounds the alarm, the emotional center becomes irritated or fearful, the intellectual center begins defending the belief, and the moving center may already be preparing the words. All four centers can become involved within seconds.

Somewhere in the confusion, the original question—Is what this person is saying true?—may disappear entirely.

This is why self-observation requires a certain willingness to be surprised by ourselves. We begin discovering that some things we thought were principles may partly be defenses. Some things we called discernment may contain fear. Some things we called righteous anger may contain wounded pride. That does not mean every conviction is false or every anger unjustified. It simply means we are learning to look underneath the label.

The Moving Center and the Power of Habit

The moving center can also occupy the throne, although we may notice it less because its kingdom is habit. Consider how many actions happen without conscious decision. We reach for the phone, interrupt someone, finish another person’s sentence, open the refrigerator without being hungry, or begin talking before we have decided whether anything actually needs to be said.

These actions may seem small, but they reveal something important about human machinery: much of life runs through established pathways. This is necessary. We would be helpless if every action required complete conscious attention. But habits become a problem when the moving center continues carrying out old programs after they have stopped serving us.

An emotional button gets pushed, and the familiar response begins automatically—the same facial expression, the same tone, the same argument, the same withdrawal, the same need to explain. We may have performed the sequence hundreds of times. The moving center knows the routine very well.

This is one reason genuine change can feel strangely uncomfortable. We are asking the machinery not to follow the familiar path. For a brief moment, there is no script. And that uncomfortable little gap may be precisely where freedom begins.

Catching the Coronation

The purpose of this work is not to spend the day analyzing ourselves endlessly. That would simply give the intellectual center another throne to sit on. The practice is much simpler: we learn to catch the coronation.

Something happens and a reaction begins. Instead of immediately trying to stop it, fix it, justify it, or condemn it, we watch. Perhaps the first thing we notice is the body: There is that tightening. Then emotion: I feel irritated. Then thought: My mind is beginning to explain why I should be irritated. Finally comes the impulse toward action: I want to answer immediately.

For once, the whole sequence is visible. We have not eliminated the reaction, but we are no longer entirely inside it. That distinction is enormous.

The Fourth Way sometimes speaks of self-remembering—a state in which we are not merely aware of the object before us but are also aware of ourselves experiencing it. We remember that something is happening to and within us. I hear the person’s words, and I am also aware of myself hearing them. I notice the reaction, and I am also aware that I am observing the reaction.

That additional awareness may last only a few seconds at first, but those few seconds can change the direction of an entire conversation. Perhaps we still respond. Perhaps we decide the situation genuinely requires a firm answer. Self-observation does not mean becoming passive. The difference is that our response is no longer completely dictated by the first king who rushed toward the throne. We have received the impression first. Then we choose.

This Is Not About Destroying the Lesser Kings

There is an important safeguard here. When we discover these mechanical parts of ourselves, it can be tempting to turn self-observation into another form of judgment. I shouldn’t feel this. I shouldn’t think that. I need to get rid of my ego. But that simply creates another divided kingdom.

The goal is not to execute the lesser kings. Each king has its place. Fear may warn us of genuine danger. Anger may reveal that a boundary has been violated. Thought may expose deception. Emotion may tell us something matters deeply. Habit can make useful actions effortless. Ambition can help us accomplish something worthwhile, and caution can keep us from doing something foolish.

The problem is not their existence. The problem is authority. Who gets the final word?

This is where the garden image becomes increasingly meaningful. A healthy garden contains many different forms of life. We do not create order by destroying everything except one plant. We cultivate, prune, guide, and place things where they belong. Our inner life may require something similar.

The intellect does not need to disappear; it needs proper work. Emotion does not need to disappear; it needs proper work. Instinct does not need to disappear; it needs proper work. The moving center does not need to disappear; it needs proper work. They become servants of something deeper rather than competing rulers.

The question we have been carrying through this series therefore becomes more precise: Which king is ruling right now—and is that the king I truly want to serve?

A Simple Practice for the Week

For the next several days, don’t attempt to observe everything. Instead, pay particular attention to moments when you notice a stronger-than-normal reaction. It might happen when someone says something irritating, a news story pushes one of your buttons, an email creates frustration, a family member disagrees with you, or a plan suddenly changes.

Instead of immediately following the reaction, become curious about the order in which things happened. Did the body react first? Did emotion appear first? Did thought begin producing a story? Did you feel an almost physical urge to speak or act? Then ask one simple question: Who is on the throne?

There is no need to force anything else. Even if you react exactly as you always have, this time you see what happened, and something has changed. Perhaps you recognize it ten minutes afterward. Good. Next time it may be five minutes. Eventually it may be thirty seconds. Then perhaps you see it while it is happening.

And one day, in that tiny interval between impression and reaction, you may discover something that was not available before: choice.

The real work is not becoming perfect. It is remembering sooner.

Every time we remember, the rightful King has another opportunity to return to the throne.

— Chapter 6: A Deck of Cards for Seeing Ourselves

In the next chapter, we will introduce a simple tool that can help us recognize these centers and the different ways they operate. We will use the four suits of an ordinary deck of playing cards as a temporary map—not as another belief system, but as a practical aid for learning to see ourselves more clearly. Eventually we will want to put the cards aside. But first, they can help us learn the landscape.

If you are joining us here, you may wish to start with chapter 1 or return to chapter 4.

Next

A Note About This Series: During this series, it may seem that there is some repetition. This is intentional. These ideas are not meant simply to be understood intellectually, but gradually integrated into our everyday awareness. Repetition and reminders can help bring patterns that normally remain beneath conscious awareness into the surface mind, until observation becomes more natural and less something we have to strive to remember. Also, throughout these chapters, references to the lesser “king” or the king attempting to take the throne are generally referring to the ego and our mechanical reactions—not to Christ or the true spiritual King.

If these articles are useful to you, feel free to share them with someone who may also be discovering that the hardest kingdom to understand is often the one within us.

Share

Leave a comment

In the last chapter, we looked at identification—what happens when a thought, emotion, fear, opinion, role, or desire becomes so dominant that we no longer experience it as something happening within us. For the moment, it becomes us. Anger does not merely arise; I am angry. Fear does not simply appear; I am afraid. An opinion is challenged, and suddenly defending that opinion feels almost the same as defending ourselves. Identification allows one small part of our inner world to become the whole.

But this raises another question. What are these different parts that keep taking over?

One of the most useful ideas found in the Fourth Way teachings is that a human being does not operate from one single inner mechanism. We have several different functions, or centers, each designed to perform a particular kind of work. Similar observations can be found in many older teachings, although the language differs. The value of the Fourth Way approach is not that we must accept its terminology as doctrine, but that it gives us something practical to observe in ourselves. Instead of simply saying, “That is just the way I am,” we can begin asking a much more interesting question:

Which part of me is operating right now?

Different Tools for Different Jobs

Consider how naturally we understand specialization in ordinary life. A carpenter does not use a hammer to turn every screw. A mechanic does not use a wrench where a voltmeter is required. Each tool has a purpose, and problems arise when we ask the wrong tool to do the job.

Something similar happens within us.

The intellectual center thinks, compares, analyzes, plans, remembers information, forms concepts, and tries to understand. It is enormously valuable. Without it we could not reason through a problem, plan tomorrow’s work, read these words, repair a machine, balance a checkbook, or examine our beliefs. Thinking is not the enemy. The problem begins when thinking attempts to control things that cannot be solved merely by thinking.

The emotional center experiences relationship, beauty, affection, sadness, enthusiasm, compassion, disappointment, resentment, joy, and countless other qualities of feeling. Emotion gives color and meaning to life. We would not want to eliminate it even if we could. Yet emotion can also become a temporary ruler. A remark from another person may produce irritation, and within seconds the emotional center has drafted the intellectual center into its service. The mind begins producing arguments explaining why our irritation is justified.

The instinctive center is concerned largely with the body and survival. Hunger, thirst, physical comfort, pain, danger, bodily regulation, and many automatic processes belong here. It contains an enormous intelligence that operates without our conscious direction. We do not have to remember to digest breakfast or regulate our heartbeat. Instinct also helps warn us when something feels unsafe.

The moving center handles physical action and learned movement. Walking, typing, driving, using tools, playing an instrument, mowing a lawn, operating machinery, and thousands of other learned physical activities gradually become largely automatic. Imagine having to consciously calculate every movement required simply to walk across the room. Fortunately, the moving center learns the pattern and carries it out for us.

None of these centers is bad. In fact, life would be impossible without them.

The problem is government.

Each has legitimate authority, but none was intended to become the supreme ruler.

That brings us directly back to the image that has followed us throughout Get the King Out of the Garden. We might think of these centers as officials within an inner government. The intellect should think. Emotion should feel. Instinct should protect and regulate. The moving center should act. Each king has its place, but is subordinate to the King we put into office.

Trouble begins when one of the lesser kings decides it belongs on the throne.

When the Wrong Center Takes the Job

We can see this happening constantly once we begin watching for it. Suppose someone says something critical about us. The emotional center reacts almost instantly. There may be a tightening in the abdomen or chest before a single conscious thought has occurred. Then the intellectual center arrives—but instead of calmly examining what was said, it becomes the lawyer for the wounded emotion. It gathers evidence, remembers previous offenses, imagines motives, and prepares a response.

We may think we are reasoning.

Often we are merely thinking emotionally.

Or perhaps the intellect encounters a situation it cannot control. Someone we love is going through a difficult time. There may be nothing we can presently fix, yet the mind continues circling the problem: What if this happens? What if that happens? What should I have done? What should they do? The thinking center has been given a task for which thinking alone has no solution, but it keeps running anyway.

This helps explain something most of us have experienced: lying awake at two o’clock in the morning solving a problem that cannot possibly be solved at two o’clock in the morning.

The machinery does not know when to quit.

Instinct can also move beyond its proper role. Its job is to protect us, but a protective response can become attached to situations that pose no genuine danger. We may experience bodily tension when someone challenges our beliefs, embarrasses us, disagrees with us, or simply looks at us critically. The body can respond as though survival itself were threatened.

Then another center joins in.

The emotional center feels fear.

The intellectual center explains the fear.

And suddenly the entire inner government is mobilized over something as simple as another person’s opinion.

If we are completely identified with the experience, we never see any of this. There is simply “me” reacting.

Self-observation changes the picture.

We begin noticing the sequence.

There is the tightening.

There is the emotion.

There is the thought defending it.

And something extraordinary has happened.

We are watching.

The Space Between the Centers and the Observer

This is where the earlier chapters begin connecting. We discovered that there appear to be many different “I’s” within us. We then explored identification—how one of those temporary states can become the whole of who we believe ourselves to be. The centers give us another way of seeing the same inner landscape.

When irritation arises, instead of immediately saying, “I am irritated,” we might simply notice, “Irritation is present.”

When the mind begins constructing an argument, we can notice, “The thinking center is building a case.”

When the stomach tightens as someone disagrees with us, we can notice, “The body is reacting before I have decided anything.”

We are not trying to suppress these reactions. That would simply create another struggle inside ourselves. We are learning to receive the impression before automatically becoming the reaction.

This distinction is subtle but enormously important.

Someone speaks.

An impression enters.

Something within us reacts.

Usually these events occur so quickly that they seem like one event. But attention begins to separate them. There is what happened. There is the reaction arising within me. And then, potentially, there is something deeper that can decide what happens next.

That tiny interval may be one of the most important spaces we ever discover.

It is where choice begins.

Subscribe now

You Can Practice This Almost Anywhere

This work does not require a monastery, retreat, special clothing, or hours of meditation. Ordinary life provides more material than we could ever use. Family conversations are excellent laboratories. So are meetings, traffic, television, social media, news programs, political discussions, religious disagreements, irritating emails, and conversations with people who see the world differently than we do.

The next time something pushes one of your buttons, don’t begin by trying to change the reaction.

Just become interested in it.

Where did it begin?

Was the first response a thought, an emotion, or a bodily sensation?

Did your shoulders tighten? Did something move in your stomach? Did anger appear before the words explaining the anger? Did the mind immediately begin preparing a defense? Did you suddenly feel the need to correct someone?

The question is not, “How do I stop doing this?”

Not yet.

The first question is simply:

“Can I see it happening?”

There is a tremendous difference between being angry and observing anger arising. There is a difference between having a fearful thought and watching the mind produce fearful possibilities. There is even a difference between automatically speaking and noticing the impulse to speak before the words come out.

This is why progress in self-observation may not initially look very impressive from the outside. We may still react. We may still become irritated. We may still say something we wish we had not said. But perhaps an hour later we recognize what happened. Eventually we recognize it ten minutes later. Then one minute later.

One day we recognize it while it is happening.

And sometimes we catch it just before.

That is growth.

The goal is not to become a person who never feels anger, fear, excitement, disappointment, or enthusiasm. Nor is it to turn the intellect off or distrust instinct. These centers belong in the garden. They have work to do.

We are simply learning not to hand the throne to whichever one happens to shout the loudest.

Who Should Be King?

This brings us to a distinction that will become increasingly important as we move forward. If the intellectual center is not supposed to rule, and neither are emotion, instinct, or habit, then what should rule?

I don’t think the answer is simply another part of the personality.

The deeper goal is the development of an inner center of gravity—a place within us increasingly aligned with truth, conscience, love, and ultimately with God. From that deeper place, the other faculties do not disappear. They become properly ordered.

The intellect becomes a servant of truth rather than a lawyer for the ego.

Emotion becomes capable of love without having to control everything it loves.

Instinct protects the body without turning every disagreement into a threat.

The moving center carries out what has consciously been decided rather than merely repeating yesterday’s habits.

Perhaps this gives us another way to understand the inner meaning of the prayer, “Thy will be done.”

It is not simply asking God to arrange circumstances outside us according to some divine plan. It may also be an invitation to bring order into the kingdom within.

Let thought have its place.

Let emotion have its place.

Let instinct have its place.

Let action have its place.

But let none of them claim the throne.

And so our practice for now can remain wonderfully simple. Several times during the day, especially when we notice ourselves reacting strongly, ask:

Which part of me is answering right now?

Then add a second question:

Can I see that part without becoming it?

And finally:

Which king is ruling right now—and is that the king I truly want to serve?

We do not have to manufacture an answer.

For now, learning to see the inner government in operation is enough.

Once we can see the kings, we are much less likely to unconsciously crown one.

Coming Next — Chapter 5: When the Wrong King Takes the Throne

In the next article, we’ll look more closely at what happens when one center begins doing the work of another—and why some of our most familiar reactions may actually be cases of the wrong part of us running the show. We will also begin developing a simple way of recognizing these patterns in everyday life without turning self-observation into another complicated system.

If you are starting here you may wish to go to chapter 1 or back to chapter 3.

If these articles are helpful, feel free to share them with someone who may also be asking the deeper question: Who is really running my inner life?

A Note About This Series: During this series, it may seem that there is some repetition. This is intentional. These ideas are not meant simply to be understood intellectually, but gradually integrated into our everyday awareness. Repetition and reminders can help bring patterns that normally remain beneath conscious awareness into the surface mind, until observation becomes more natural and less something we have to strive to remember. Also, throughout these chapters, references to the lesser “king” or the king attempting to take the throne are generally referring to the ego and our mechanical reactions—not to Christ or the true spiritual King.

Share

Leave a comment

In the last article, we explored the idea that what we normally call “I” may actually be made up of many different parts, impulses, emotions, habits, opinions, and reactions that take turns speaking for us. One moment we are patient, another moment irritated. One moment generous, another defensive. One moment determined to change, and a few hours later another part of us seems to have completely forgotten the decision. But simply having many different reactions within us is not necessarily the problem. The deeper issue begins when we become so caught up in one of them that, for a time, we no longer recognize it as merely one part of our inner experience. We become it. This is what is often meant by identification.

Identification happens when a thought, emotion, role, opinion, fear, desire, or reaction becomes so completely joined with our sense of self that we can no longer see it objectively. Instead of noticing, “Anger is arising in me,” we simply become angry. Instead of noticing, “A part of me feels threatened,” we become the threatened person. Instead of recognizing, “I have a strong opinion about this,” the opinion becomes part of who we believe ourselves to be. At that point, challenging the opinion can feel almost like challenging our very existence.

When the Part Becomes the Whole

Imagine receiving an email that immediately irritates you. Before opening it, you may have been perfectly calm. Then a few words enter through your eyes and something begins to happen. Your body tightens, your thoughts accelerate, and you begin constructing a response. Perhaps you reread the message several times, each time finding another sentence that bothers you. Within minutes, your entire inner world may revolve around that email. Nothing outside has changed except a few words on a screen, yet internally one reaction has expanded until it fills nearly the whole field of consciousness. For that moment, irritation is not simply something you are experiencing. It has become you.

The same thing can happen with fear. We hear something concerning about the economy, our health, world events, or someone we love. A legitimate concern may arise, but instead of remaining one piece of information among many, it begins occupying more and more of our attention. Soon we are imagining every possible outcome, and the body starts responding as though those imagined possibilities are already happening. Identification does not only happen with unpleasant things either. Someone may praise us, and we naturally feel good. But then another part appears that wants more praise. We replay the compliment, begin thinking about how others see us, and may even start protecting the image that brought us the approval. We can identify with being admired just as easily as we identify with being rejected.

In fact, we can identify with almost anything. We can identify with our occupations, possessions, families, beliefs, political opinions, appearance, accomplishments, failures, memories, and the stories we tell about ourselves. Someone criticizes our profession and we feel personally attacked. Someone questions a political position we hold and our body reacts before we have even considered what was said. Someone challenges a religious belief and we may immediately feel the need to defend not only the idea, but ourselves. We can identify with being the person who is always right, the victim, the helper, the responsible one, the strong one, the spiritual one, the intelligent one, or even the person who believes he has moved beyond identification. That last one is particularly clever, because the ego can put on almost any costume, including a spiritual one.

All of us also live through roles. We may be a husband or wife, parent, grandparent, employer, employee, farmer, teacher, pastor, supervisor, friend, caregiver, or neighbor. These roles are useful and necessary. Problems arise only when we forget that a role is something we perform rather than the totality of who we are. A parent may become so identified with being needed that when the children become independent, there is a deep sense of loss. A person may become so identified with a career that retirement feels like the disappearance of self. Someone who has spent years being “the strong one” may find it almost impossible to admit weakness or ask for help. Even our history can become an identity. We say, “I have always been this way,” “That is just who I am,” or “I am the kind of person who…” Those statements may contain some truth, but they can also become invisible walls. Some of what we call personality may simply be patterns we have practiced for so long that we can no longer imagine ourselves without them.

Identification Narrows the Field

One of the easiest ways to recognize identification is by what happens to our awareness. It becomes narrow. When we are deeply identified, we usually see only the part of reality that supports the state we are already in. If we are angry, we remember everything the other person has ever done wrong. If we are afraid, we notice every possible danger. If we are jealous, we interpret innocent events as evidence. If we are proud, we remember our accomplishments. If we feel rejected, we begin collecting proof that nobody appreciates us. Our inner state starts selecting the evidence, and because the evidence seems so convincing, we rarely realize that our field of vision has become smaller.

This helps explain why arguments are so difficult to resolve when both people are identified. Each person sees the situation through a narrowed field shaped by emotion, past experience, and the desire to be right. Both may sincerely believe they are simply seeing reality. Neither may realize how much their inner state is determining what they notice and what they ignore.

The body can help us recognize this process earlier than the mind does. There may be a tightening in the abdomen, the shoulders rise, the jaw clenches, breathing changes, the heart rate increases, or heat rises into the face. Often the body reacts before the mind has fully constructed the story that explains the reaction. This makes bodily sensation a kind of early-warning system. Something is said. The stomach tightens. A thought appears, then another, then the urge to respond. If we can notice the process early enough, we may catch identification while it is happening rather than only recognizing it afterward.

At first, that may happen long after the event. We may recognize the next day that we were completely caught in a reaction. Later, perhaps we see it an hour afterward, then ten minutes afterward, and eventually while it is still happening. Progress in this kind of work may not mean that we suddenly stop having reactions. It may simply mean that we begin remembering sooner. Eventually, there may come a moment when an impression enters, the reaction begins, and somewhere between the two awareness appears: “I can feel myself reacting.” That tiny moment changes everything, because now the reaction is no longer completely invisible.

The Space Between Impression and Response

There is a small space between an impression and our response. At first it may seem almost nonexistent. Someone says something irritating and the reaction appears immediately. But with practice, the space can begin to widen. The impression comes in, the reaction begins, and awareness appears before the process is complete. This does not guarantee that we will respond wisely. We may still say the wrong thing, become angry, or get pulled into the old pattern. But something has changed. We remembered ourselves before the whole process finished.

Suppose someone says something that feels insulting. Ordinarily the reaction may be nearly automatic. But this time we notice the body tighten, we feel the urge to respond, and we wait. Perhaps only three seconds. During that pause, several possibilities appear that otherwise would have remained invisible. Maybe the person did not mean the remark the way we heard it. Maybe they are having a terrible day. Maybe there is some truth in what they said. Maybe the best response is to ask a question. Maybe no response is needed at all. The impression has not disappeared, and the emotion may still be there, but the reaction is no longer the only possible future.

This is where freedom begins to enter, and it is important to understand that non-identification does not mean indifference. The goal is not to become detached in the sense of no longer caring. If someone is suffering, compassion may require us to become deeply involved. If injustice occurs, we may need to act. If someone we love is in danger, fear may arise for a perfectly good reason. Non-identification simply means that the emotion does not completely possess us. We can feel anger without allowing anger to decide everything we do. We can experience fear without allowing fear to become the ruler. We can hold a strong opinion without needing to destroy anyone who disagrees. We can love someone deeply without making our own identity dependent on that person’s approval. This is not less feeling. It may actually be a more conscious form of feeling.

Subscribe now

Returning to the Throne

The image of the throne becomes useful again here. A lesser king does not necessarily seize power because it is evil. More often, it simply arises and finds the throne unattended. Fear appears and sits down. Anger appears and sits down. Pride appears and sits down. The need to be right appears and sits down. The desire for approval appears and sits down. Once seated, each begins issuing orders as though it represents the whole kingdom.

Self-observation does something very simple: it notices who is sitting there. That awareness alone begins changing the situation. We might ask, “What has taken the throne right now?” or “What part of me is answering?” Then perhaps the most important question of all: “Can I see that part without becoming it?” The answer will not always be yes, but even asking the question introduces something that was not present before—awareness.

This way of looking inward may also help us hear some of Jesus’s teachings differently. Again and again, Jesus challenged people to release identities they had taken to be absolute. Social standing, religious reputation, possessions, family expectations, status, and even personal righteousness could all become attachments strong enough to prevent someone from seeing clearly. The rich young ruler is an obvious example. His possessions were not necessarily evil, yet something about his relationship to them had become binding. The Pharisee who thanked God that he was not like other people had become identified with his own righteousness. Those who competed over who would be greatest had become identified with rank and importance.

Jesus continually pointed beyond the identities people had constructed: lose your life to find it, become like a child, the first shall be last, do not perform righteousness merely to be seen. These teachings become especially interesting when read inwardly. What if part of losing our life means releasing our identification with the personality we have mistaken for the whole of ourselves? Not destroying personality, rejecting our history, or becoming passive, but no longer allowing every temporary role, reaction, opinion, and self-image to define who we are.

A Simple Practice

For the next few days, don’t try too hard to become less identified. That effort itself can become another identification. Instead, simply notice the moments when your world suddenly becomes small. Something happens, and your attention becomes consumed by it. You replay a conversation. You imagine an argument that has not happened. You keep checking whether someone responded. You feel the need to prove your point. You begin defending yourself internally even though nobody is present. You cannot stop thinking about what someone thinks of you.

These are useful moments. Instead of saying, “I should not be doing this,” simply ask, “What am I identified with right now?” Then notice what is happening in the body. Notice the thoughts. Notice the story. See whether there is even a small part of you capable of observing the entire process. If so, remain there for a moment. No fighting. No suppressing. No judging. Just seeing.

We often imagine freedom as having the ability to do whatever we want, but what if many of the things we “want” are simply temporary impulses produced by whichever part happens to occupy the throne? Perhaps a deeper freedom begins when we are no longer compelled to obey every thought, emotion, impulse, and identity that passes through us. A thought may arise without becoming a command. An emotion may arise without becoming an identity. An insult may arrive without demanding retaliation. A compliment may arrive without needing to become self-importance. Fear may speak without becoming king.

That is a very different kind of freedom. It is inward freedom. And perhaps that is one reason self-observation matters so much. We cannot become free from something we do not know is controlling us. The first step is not conquering it. The first step is seeing it.

Then, gradually, we begin to recognize that what we experience is not necessarily the same thing as who we are. A thought appears. An emotion appears. A role appears. A reaction appears. They come, and they go. Yet something remains capable of seeing them.

And once again we arrive at the quiet question underneath everything we have been exploring:

Who is watching?

If you are starting here you may wish to start at chapter 1 or back to chapter 2.

Coming Next

In the next article, we will look more closely at the different functions or centers within us—thought, emotion, instinct, movement, and the other forces that shape how we respond to life. Rather than treating these parts as enemies, we will begin exploring what each one is designed to do, what happens when one takes over work that does not belong to it, and why putting the inner kingdom in order may be very different from trying to suppress parts of ourselves.

If this series speaks to something you have been sensing in your own life, feel free to share it with someone who may be asking similar questions. We are not trying to establish another system of beliefs. We are exploring together, testing these ideas in our own experience, and seeing where the search for truth leads.

A Note About This Series: During this series, it may seem that there is some repetition. This is intentional. These ideas are not meant simply to be understood intellectually, but gradually integrated into our everyday awareness. Repetition and reminders can help bring patterns that normally remain beneath conscious awareness into the surface mind, until observation becomes more natural and less something we have to strive to remember. Also, throughout these chapters, references to the lesser “king” or the king attempting to take the throne are generally referring to the ego and our mechanical reactions—not to Christ or the true spiritual King.

Share

Leave a comment

In the previous article, we began with a simple idea: perhaps real spiritual growth requires more than believing the right things or even sincerely wanting to become a better person. Perhaps we also have to learn to see ourselves as we actually are. That sounds simple enough, but if we begin practicing self-observation—even for a short time—we may discover something rather unsettling. The person we call “I” does not seem nearly as consistent as we imagine.

One morning I may wake feeling patient, peaceful, and grateful. An hour later someone says the wrong thing, and suddenly I am irritated. A little later I may feel generous and compassionate. Then someone challenges an opinion I hold strongly, and another part of me appears that wants to defend itself, prove a point, or win the argument. Each time, I say “I.” I am thankful. I am angry. I think this. I don’t care. I am going to change. I will never do that again. Yet the “I” making one statement may not be the same “I” that takes control a few hours later. That observation lies near the heart of what has sometimes been called the teaching of the many I’s.

Are There Really Many of Us?

This does not mean that we literally contain separate people, nor does it mean that something is psychologically wrong with us. It is simply a way of describing something we can observe for ourselves. Different impulses, desires, fears, emotions, habits, and opinions move through us continually, and for a time each one can speak as though it represents our entire being.

Consider something very ordinary. At night I may sincerely decide, “Tomorrow morning I am going to get up early and exercise.” The person saying that may mean every word. Morning arrives, the alarm goes off, and another voice says, “You didn’t sleep that well. Missing one day won’t matter.” Ten minutes later, I am still in bed. Which one was me? The one who sincerely intended to exercise, or the one who sincerely wanted another half hour of sleep? We normally resolve this by simply saying, “I changed my mind.” Sometimes we did. But sometimes it may be more revealing to ask whether a different part of us temporarily took control.

The same thing happens in much more important areas of life. We may sincerely decide to be patient with someone, only to become impatient when that person annoys us again. We may determine that we are finished carrying an old resentment, yet find ourselves replaying the offense the next time the person’s name is mentioned. We may tell ourselves that possessions are not terribly important, then become surprisingly upset when something we value is damaged. We may believe deeply in kindness and compassion, yet become harsh toward someone whose political, religious, or social opinions offend us. None of this necessarily means we are hypocrites. It may simply mean that we have never really noticed how many different forces compete for the throne within us.

Who Is Sitting on the Throne?

This is where our earlier image of the king begins to become useful. There may be many legitimate “kings” within us. The intellect has its place. Emotion has its place. Instinct has its place. Our physical drives, ambitions, fears, memories, caution, imagination, and desire for approval may all serve useful purposes. The problem begins when one of them takes authority that does not belong to it.

Fear may be useful when danger is real, but fear makes a terrible ruler. Anger can alert us that something is wrong, but anger makes a dangerous king. Intellect is a wonderful servant when something needs to be understood, but intellect can also sit on the throne and convince us that because we can explain something, we have actually become it. Even our spiritual identity can become a king. “I understand things other people don’t.” “I am more awake.” “I know the truth.” “I would never behave the way that person does.” The costume may be spiritual, but the throne is still occupied.

This gives us a remarkably practical question to begin carrying into daily life: Which “I” is present right now—and is it the one I meant to be? Or, using the language of our larger journey: Which king is ruling right now—and is that the king I truly want to serve?

Catching the Change

We do not have to accept any particular teaching about the “many I’s” to investigate this. We can simply watch. Suppose someone says something critical about us. There may be a brief instant when the words are simply heard. Then something happens. Perhaps there is a tightening in the stomach. A little heat rises. Thoughts begin forming almost instantly: “Who does he think he is?” “She doesn’t know the whole story.” “I need to straighten this out.” Before long, an entire inner courtroom has assembled. Prosecutor, defense attorney, witnesses, judge, and jury are all present—and remarkably, they all seem to agree with us.

If we remain identified with this process, we simply call the whole thing me. But self-observation introduces another possibility. I can notice the tightening. I can notice the defensive thought. I can notice the desire to respond. Perhaps, for just a moment, I don’t have to become any of them. Something can be happening within me without that something being the whole of me. That small distinction may be one of the most important discoveries we can make.

There is a subtle difference between saying “I am angry” and noticing “Anger is present in me right now.” The first statement tends to join our identity to the emotion. The second creates a little space around it. We aren’t suppressing the anger. We aren’t pretending it doesn’t exist. We aren’t condemning ourselves for having it. We are simply seeing it. The same can be done with fear: “Fear is present.” Or jealousy: “Jealousy has appeared.” Or the need to be right: “There is the part of me that wants to win.” Or self-pity: “There is the part that wants someone to recognize how badly I have been treated.”

We don’t have to fight these parts. In fact, fighting them can simply create another “I”—the part of us that becomes proud of fighting the other parts. Observation is quieter than that. We see. We acknowledge. We wait. And something very interesting begins to happen.

Then Who Is Doing the Watching?

This brings us back to the question from the previous article: If I can observe my thoughts, emotions, impulses, and reactions, who is the “I” doing the observing? I don’t think we should answer that question too quickly. The temptation is to turn it into another belief. We could call the observer consciousness. We could call it spirit. We could call it the true self, the deeper self, or eventually perhaps the Real I. But giving something a name is not the same as experiencing it.

For now, it may be enough to notice that there appears to be something within us capable of observing the parade without automatically joining it. That possibility has enormous spiritual implications. When Jesus repeatedly called people to watch, to wake up, and to develop eyes that see and ears that hear, perhaps these teachings reach further inward than we sometimes realize. We usually think of awakening as recognizing truth outside ourselves. But what if awakening also involves recognizing what is happening inside ourselves?

The old person and the new person spoken of in Scripture may not simply describe someone before and after accepting a set of beliefs. They may point toward an actual transformation in the center from which we live. The old pattern reacts. Something deeper can observe. And observation creates the possibility of choice.

The Space Between Impression and Reaction

Most of our day begins with impressions. Someone looks at us strangely. A news story appears on the screen. A bill arrives. Someone praises us. Someone ignores us. Our spouse uses a certain tone of voice. A memory appears. An ache develops somewhere in the body. Each impression enters us, and almost immediately something responds. The response may be so fast that we experience the two as one event. Someone insults me—I become angry. Someone compliments me—I feel important. Someone disagrees with me—I defend myself.

But what if there is a tiny space between the impression and the reaction? And what if self-observation gradually allows us to become conscious within that space? That does not mean we become emotionless. Quite the opposite. We may begin to experience emotion more clearly because we are no longer being completely swept away by it. We can receive the impression first, then see what arises, and then choose whether the reaction deserves expression. This may be one small beginning of freedom.

This is also why the goal is not to eliminate emotion, intellect, instinct, personality, ambition, caution, or even the parts of ourselves that sometimes cause problems. Each has its place. Intellect should think. Emotion should feel. Instinct should protect. The moving part of us should act. Caution can protect us from foolish choices. Ambition can motivate us to accomplish something worthwhile. Even anger may sometimes provide energy to confront injustice. The trouble comes when a part assumes that because it has something important to contribute, it should therefore rule the entire kingdom.

Each king has its place, but is subordinate to the King we put into office.

And that brings the dream phrase that began this entire project into a slightly sharper focus: Get the King Out of the Garden. Perhaps the question was never simply, “How do I get rid of the ego?” Maybe it is more subtle. Which king needs to get out of the Garden? The answer may change from moment to moment. Sometimes it is fear. Sometimes pride. Sometimes resentment. Sometimes our need to be liked. Sometimes our need to be right. Sometimes even the image we have constructed of ourselves as a good, spiritual, enlightened, or knowledgeable person. Any of these can walk into the Garden and sit on the throne. The work is not necessarily to destroy them. It is to recognize them before they convince us that they are the King.

Subscribe now

A Simple Experiment

During the next few days, try something very simple. Don’t attempt to change anything. Just notice the different “I’s” as they appear. When irritation arises, notice it. When you suddenly want someone’s approval, notice that. When you feel the urge to correct someone, notice it. When you make a promise to yourself and another part later tries to renegotiate it, notice both. When you are generous, notice that too. When compassion arises naturally, notice it.

This isn’t a hunt for everything wrong with us. That would quickly become another form of judgment. We are simply becoming acquainted with the inhabitants of our own inner world. You may even begin recognizing some regular visitors: the worrier, the critic, the rescuer, the judge, the one who wants recognition, the one who avoids conflict, the one who enjoys being needed, or the one who wants to prove something. And perhaps occasionally something much quieter appears—something that does not seem to need to defend itself at all. Don’t hurry to name that either. Just notice.

The Beginning of Self-Knowledge

For most of our lives, we naturally assume that because a thought occurs in our mind, I thought it; because an emotion appears, I feel it; and because an impulse arises, I want it. Self-observation begins loosening that assumption. Not every thought deserves our agreement. Not every emotion deserves expression. Not every impulse deserves action. Not every inner voice deserves the throne.

Perhaps that is part of what spiritual maturity actually looks like. The Fruit of the Spirit may not develop because we force ourselves to act loving, joyful, peaceful, patient, kind, good, faithful, gentle, and self-controlled. Those qualities may increasingly appear as the inner kingdom comes into better order. The lesser kings return to their proper places. The throne is no longer seized by every passing reaction. Somewhere within that process, we may begin to discover the person beneath all the changing personalities we have accumulated—not a person we manufacture, but a person we uncover.

Perhaps we may even begin to encounter something of the original essence with which we entered this life, now matured through everything we have experienced. The journey inward, then, is not about becoming someone artificial. It may be about finally discovering who has been hidden beneath all the voices saying “I.”

That leaves us with two questions worth carrying for a while: Which “I” is present right now—and is it the one I meant to be? And beneath that question lies an even deeper one: If I can see all these different parts of myself coming and going—who is it that sees them?

We will continue there.

Coming Next

In the next article, we will look more closely at identification—what happens when a thought, emotion, role, opinion, fear, or desire does more than appear within us and instead becomes, for the moment, who we believe ourselves to be. That may help explain why simply knowing better so often fails to produce lasting change—and why the ability to observe ourselves without immediately becoming what we observe may be one of the first real steps toward inner freedom.

If you are starting here, you may wish to go back to chapter 1. Or Next

If this series speaks to something you have been sensing in your own life, feel free to share it with someone who may be asking similar questions. We are not trying to establish another system of beliefs. We are exploring together, testing these ideas in our own experience, and seeing where the search for truth leads.

Share

Leave a comment

If you have not read the bible series, here is the first of that series. Another note, to see all publications in the order they were published just go to the main url.

As we close out this symbolic Bible series, we are left with an important question: I see the message—but now what? How do I know whether I am actually on the right track? How do I begin to grow beyond the programming, conditioning, habits, and reactions that have shaped so much of who I think I am?

We recently looked at the Fruit of the Spirit—the qualities that should increasingly become visible in the life of a Spirit-filled person. Love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control sound wonderful. But how do we actually get there? We can believe in these qualities and sincerely desire them while still finding ourselves doing many of the same things we have done for years.

We might have an emotional outburst and regret it afterward, only to automatically do it again the next time the right button gets pushed. Maybe we criticize someone without really knowing the whole story behind why that person behaves as they do. Perhaps we unconsciously belittle someone we love, or we become so occupied with something else that we ignore a grandchild who simply wants us to notice them. Most of us can probably think of our own examples.

The difficulty is that we cannot consciously change something in ourselves that we do not yet see.

What If We Had a Mirror?

What if there were a kind of symbolic mirror we could look into that might help reveal some of these unconscious patterns? And what if, instead of condemning ourselves for what we see, we could learn to observe these tendencies and gradually bring them into greater balance?

I recently purchased a book called Centers of Gravity, along with several other books exploring similar ideas. They present different ways of looking at ourselves through four basic centers and the ways those centers tend to operate. As I have been reading, I have begun recognizing things about myself—and about the way I relate to other people—that I had experienced throughout my life but had never really had words for.

That is what I would like us to explore together in this next series.

This is not intended to become another system for putting people into boxes and saying, “You’re this kind of person, and I’m that kind.” Quite the opposite. The purpose is observation of self. The centers, types, and even the symbolism of playing cards are only mirrors. They may help us recognize which part of ourselves is responding at a particular moment and, eventually, whether that response is conscious or merely automatic.

Awakening From the Mechanical Life

This brings us to an uncomfortable possibility: much more of our daily life may be automatic than we realize.

Someone says something, and we become angry. Someone challenges one of our beliefs, and we immediately defend it. Someone hurts our feelings, and we withdraw. Something frightens us, and our body reacts before we have even considered what is happening. We call all of these responses “I,” but how much conscious choice was actually involved?

The first step is not suppressing these reactions. It is seeing them.

We have to awaken enough from the largely automatic state in which we often live to observe our actions and reactions while they are happening. That little space between an impression and our response is enormously important. If I can see the reaction before automatically becoming the reaction, something new becomes possible. I may actually have a choice.

And this raises an even deeper question that I think will eventually become central to everything we explore:

If I can observe my thoughts, emotions, and reactions, who is the “I” doing the observing?

A Practical System of Self-Observation

The teaching we will be partially drawing from is commonly associated today with George Ivanovich Gurdjieff, who introduced what became known as the Fourth Way to Western students in the early twentieth century. Many of the principles involved—self-observation, attention, awakening from mechanical behavior, and inner transformation—are much older and can be found in various spiritual traditions.

Later students and teachers, including P. D. Ouspensky and others who followed, developed different ways of explaining and applying these ideas. Some approaches eventually used centers, types, and even ordinary playing cards as symbolic tools for recognizing patterns within ourselves.

One important distinction in this teaching is between what Gurdjieff called essence and personality. Essence refers roughly to what is more deeply and innately ours, while personality contains much that we acquire from family, education, culture, expectations, and the experiences of life.

Personality is not something evil that needs to be destroyed. We need personality to function in the world. The problem is not that we have a personality, but that so much of it can operate without our awareness. We can become so completely identified with our habits, opinions, emotional reactions, fears, desires, ambitions, and self-image that we mistake all of them for the whole of who we are.

The purpose, then, is not to kill the ego. It is to become conscious enough to see our inner machinery operating without automatically being controlled by it. An emotion can arise without having to become our master. A thought can appear without automatically being true. An impulse can occur without automatically becoming an action.

Perhaps we could put it very simply:

Something can be happening within me without that something being the whole of me.

Subscribe now

Who Am I?

Eventually, I think this brings us somewhere much deeper than personality analysis.

Perhaps the great question underneath this entire exploration is not simply, How can I improve my personality? It is:

Who am I, really?

The Fourth Way proposes that the “I” we ordinarily experience is far less unified and conscious than we imagine. Its practices therefore encourage us to awaken from this mechanical condition and develop a greater capacity for observation, attention, and conscious choice.

For me, this points toward something deeper still: becoming increasingly receptive to God.

That is where I see this connecting directly with everything we have been exploring throughout our journey through the Bible.

The symbolic Bible series has repeatedly pointed us inward. The Kingdom is within. The old person dies, and something new is born. We are called to awaken. We are transformed by the renewing of the mind. The Fruit of the Spirit gradually becomes visible in a transformed life. And ultimately, the journey leads us home to the Father.

Perhaps now we are ready to ask:

How can I actually observe that transformation happening within myself?

That is where our next journey begins.

We are not leaving the Bible series behind and suddenly studying Gurdjieff. We are asking the practical question that naturally follows everything we have already explored.

The Bible series has essentially been saying:

“Wake up.”

This next series asks:

“How do I discover whether I’m awake?”

If what you have been reading has helped you see yourself or these ideas a little more clearly, perhaps someone you know would benefit from it too. If so, please consider hitting the Share button. You never know—you may help someone else begin seeing themselves, their reactions, and their journey in a new way.

next

Share

Leave a comment

We began this journey in a Garden. In Genesis, humanity awakens in Eden surrounded by life, abundance, innocence, and the presence of God. There is no temple because the Garden itself is the sanctuary. There is no priesthood because humanity walks directly with God. There is no complicated religious system because separation has not yet entered human consciousness. At the center of this Garden stand two trees: the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil and the Tree of Life.

Then something changes. Humanity eats from the tree of divided knowledge, their eyes are opened, shame appears, hiding begins, and blame follows. The human being is driven from the Garden, and from that moment onward, the Bible becomes, in one sense, the enormous story of humanity trying to find its way home.

When we finally arrive at the last chapters of Revelation, something remarkable happens. The Tree of Life is there again. The river is there again. God dwells with humanity again, and the curse is gone. The Bible ends where it began, but we do not return to the Garden as the same people who left it.

The Long Journey Home

If we read the Bible only as a sequence of historical events, Genesis and Revelation can seem separated by thousands of years and dozens of books. But when we begin reading Scripture inwardly, another pattern becomes visible. Adam and Eve, Cain and Abel, Noah, Abraham, Jacob, Joseph, Moses, Pharaoh, the wilderness, the Promised Land, David, Solomon, the prophets, exile, Jesus, the Cross, Resurrection, Pentecost, Paul, the Body of Christ, the Mind of Christ, and finally Revelation can all become descriptions of movements within the human soul.

The Bible then becomes not merely the story of people who lived long ago, but a mirror held before us. There can be an Adam within us who awakens and a serpent that whispers. There can be a Cain who becomes jealous, a Pharaoh who refuses to surrender control, a wilderness where old identities die, a promised land waiting to be entered, and a David confronting Goliath. There can be a Solomon tempted by power and excess, an exile when we become separated from what is deepest within us, and prophets calling us back. There can be a Christ knocking at the door, a cross upon which something false must die, a resurrection in which something greater can awaken, and a Pentecost in which Spirit is no longer merely encountered outside us but experienced within.

Seen this way, Revelation is not simply the destruction of the world. It is an unveiling of what has been hidden, and the New Heaven and New Earth can represent not only a renewed creation but also a transformation of consciousness—a new way of seeing and therefore a new way of living.

The entire journey has been leading us back toward the Garden.

But What Was Lost in the Garden?

Perhaps what humanity lost was not primarily a geographical location. Perhaps we lost a state of consciousness.

The Garden can represent an inner condition in which the different dimensions of the human being exist in harmony under the presence of God. There is no need to hide because there is no divided self pretending to be something it is not. There is no need to dominate because there is nothing to defend. There is awareness without the constant inner commentary that interprets, judges, fears, compares, and protects.

Then another voice enters the Garden. It begins telling us who we are, what we lack, what we deserve, whom to blame, what others are thinking about us, how important we are, or how inadequate we are. Before long, that voice begins ruling the Garden.

This is what I have increasingly come to think of as the false king. The false king is not simply evil in the ordinary sense. It is the mechanical personality—the accumulated reactions, fears, desires, defenses, habits, opinions, identities, and stories that gradually take possession of the throne of consciousness. It is the part of us that responds automatically and then tells us afterward that we consciously chose the response.

We become angry and say, “I am angry.” We become afraid and say, “I am afraid.” A thought appears, and we say, “I think.” An opinion arises, and we immediately defend it as though our very existence depends upon it. But what if the thought is happening within us without being the whole of us? What if the emotion is happening within us without needing to become our master? What if there is something deeper that can watch?

Get the King Out of the Garden

That strange phrase came to me long before I fully understood what it might mean: Get the King out of the Garden. It eventually became the title of my entire writings because I sensed that it contained something important, and over time its meaning has grown clearer.

The Garden is consciousness, and the king is whatever occupies the throne. Much of the time, the true ruler of our inner life is not the Spirit of God, love, wisdom, or conscious awareness. It is whichever mechanical part of ourselves happens to be strongest at that moment. Sometimes fear is king. Sometimes anger is king. Sometimes pride, political identity, religious certainty, the need to be right, or the approval of other people sits on the throne. Perhaps the most difficult king to recognize is the spiritual ego—the part of us that believes it has finally figured everything out.

Removing the false king does not mean destroying our personality or eliminating thought and emotion. The Garden needs all of these capacities. Thinking has a purpose. Emotion has a purpose. Instinct has a purpose. Action has a purpose. The problem arises when one part takes the throne and claims to be the whole person.

Perhaps spiritual growth is not the destruction of these parts but their restoration to their proper place. The false king must leave the throne so that something greater can occupy it.

The Sword at the Entrance

After Adam and Eve leave Eden, Genesis tells us that cherubim and a flaming sword guard the way to the Tree of Life. For years I thought of that image mainly as exclusion: humanity had sinned, so the road back was blocked. But perhaps there is another way to see it. Maybe we cannot return to the Tree of Life while remaining exactly as we were.

Something must pass through the sword. Our illusions must pass through it, along with our false identities, our certainty, our demand to control life, and our insistence that the little self remain ruler. The ego wants to return to Eden while remaining king, but that may be the one thing that cannot happen.

Jesus continually points toward this paradox. Lose your life, and you will find it. Become like a child. The greatest must become the servant. The first will be last. Take up your cross. Die so that you may live. These teachings become far more than moral commands when viewed inwardly. They can describe the dismantling of the false king.

The way back to the Garden passes through surrender.

The Tree Returns

At the end of Revelation, John sees the river of the water of life flowing from the throne of God. On either side of the river stands the Tree of Life, bearing fruit, and its leaves are for the healing of the nations. The image is astonishing because the tree humanity lost in Genesis appears once again.

Yet now the Garden has become something greater. Genesis begins with a Garden, while Revelation ends with what might be called a Garden-city. What began in innocence has now passed through struggle, suffering, knowledge, division, exile, awakening, death, and resurrection.

The destination is not simply the innocence with which we began. It is something closer to conscious union. A child may possess innocence because the child has not yet encountered much of the world’s complexity. But there is another kind of innocence that can appear after a person has encountered darkness and still chooses light, has encountered hatred and still chooses love, has encountered fear and still chooses trust, and has experienced the power of the ego without continuing to obey it.

Perhaps that is part of the consciousness represented by the New Jerusalem. We return to the Garden, but now we know what it means to leave it.

The Kingdom Was Never Far Away

Jesus said that the Kingdom of God is within—or among—you. That single teaching changes the direction of the search.

For centuries human beings have searched outwardly for the Kingdom. We have built institutions, created doctrines, fought wars, divided denominations, argued over interpretations, waited for prophetic timetables, and sometimes condemned one another in the name of the very God who commanded us to love one another. Yet Jesus continually directs attention toward transformation: blessed are the pure in heart, forgive, love your enemies, do not judge hypocritically, remove the beam from your own eye, become like a child, and seek the Kingdom.

These are not merely instructions for belonging to the correct religion. They are invitations to an entirely different quality of being. Perhaps the Garden has never been as far away as we imagined. Perhaps we have been standing in it all along while looking somewhere else.

Seeing the Serpent Without Obeying It

Returning to the Garden does not mean temptation disappears, difficult emotions vanish, or life suddenly becomes peaceful. Jesus himself experienced temptation, sorrow, frustration, opposition, and suffering. The change may not be in what appears within consciousness, but in our relationship to what appears.

A thought can arise without becoming king. Anger can arise without becoming king. Fear, desire, disappointment, pride, or even a deeply held religious belief can arise without taking possession of the throne. We can begin to see these movements rather than immediately becoming them.

The moment we see them, something remarkable happens: a small space appears between the impression and our response. In that space there is possibility. I can react, or I can observe. I can defend myself, or I can listen. I can condemn, or I can become curious. I can obey the old mechanical pattern, or I can wait long enough for another response to become possible.

Perhaps that tiny space is one of the entrances back into the Garden.

The Bible as an Inner Map

This has been the central purpose of this entire series. I have not tried to prove that the Bible is only symbolic, nor have I tried to deny its historical dimensions. My hope has simply been to recover something that can easily be overlooked: Scripture can speak about us.

The Israelites can wander through our wilderness. Pharaoh can harden his heart within us. Goliath can stand before us. Jonah can flee within us. The Prodigal Son can awaken within us. Christ can be crucified and resurrected within us. Pentecost can occur within us. Revelation can unveil what has been hidden within us, and Eden can be rediscovered within us.

Once we begin reading Scripture this way, the question changes. Instead of asking only, “Did this happen?” we begin asking another question that may be just as important: Is this happening in me?

That question cannot be answered by theology alone. It requires observation.

And That Brings Us to the Next Journey

For these many articles, we have explored the possibility that the Bible describes an inner spiritual journey. But there is an obvious problem: how do we know what is actually happening inside us?

It is easy to read about Pharaoh and recognize him in somebody else. It is easy to read about the Pharisees and think of another religious group. It is easy to recognize pride, anger, greed, fear, hypocrisy, self-deception, and stubbornness in the world around us. Seeing those same movements in ourselves is much harder, and even more difficult is observing them while they are happening.

That is where our next journey begins. I want to move now from interpretation toward observation.

Recently I have been exploring a teaching commonly called the Fourth Way, particularly its practical approach to self-observation. I do not see it as a replacement for Jesus or for the spiritual truths we have explored in this series. I am interested in it because it offers practical tools for examining something Jesus repeatedly told us to examine: ourselves.

Instead of asking only, “What does Pharaoh symbolize?” we can begin asking, “Can I notice the Pharaoh in me when it refuses to surrender control?” Instead of asking only, “What does the sleeping disciple represent?” we can ask, “Am I awake right now?” Instead of merely discussing the false king, we can learn to recognize the moment he climbs onto the throne.

The Fourth Way uses ideas such as centers of consciousness, mechanical reactions, identification, self-remembering, attention, and observing without judgment. Some of its terminology will initially sound unfamiliar, but the underlying questions are surprisingly simple: Which part of me is answering right now? Can I see that part without becoming it? What is sitting on the throne? Can I receive an impression before automatically reacting to it?

Those questions take us from philosophy into experiment. They move us away from merely believing or interpreting and toward actually observing.

The Garden Is Here

Perhaps there was never a road back to Eden because Eden was not primarily somewhere behind us. Perhaps it is something beneath the noise—beneath the identities, beneath the arguments, beneath the fear, and beneath the voice that constantly explains who we are and what everyone else is doing wrong.

There remains something within us capable of seeing, listening, and receiving the moment before judging it. There is something capable of love before asking what it will receive in return. Jesus called us toward that place again and again. The prophets pointed toward it. The Cross reveals the surrender necessary to enter it. The Resurrection reveals what can awaken when the false self no longer rules. Pentecost reveals the Spirit dwelling within, and Revelation unveils the final transformation.

At the end of the story, the Tree of Life is waiting. The river is flowing. The gates are open. The curse is gone. The Garden has returned.

Or perhaps we have finally become able to see that it was here all along.

Our short journey through the Bible is complete, but the journey into ourselves is only beginning.

Coming Next

A New Series: The Fourth Way — Learning to Observe Ourselves

We have spent this series asking what the biblical story might mean within us. Now we will begin asking a more challenging question:

Can we actually see it happening?

Next

If these teachings make sense to you, maybe you can also share them with others. Our world needs a lot of help as we are so divided and confused. Many, especially some of our young have departed from the Bibles wisdom. Maybe these articles will spark something that can make some sense out of why we are in the pickle we are in and how to grow out of it.

Share

Leave a comment

Subscribe now

The renewal of the inner world — and the life that grows from it

Near the end of Revelation, after the beasts, the battles, Babylon, judgment, and the collapse of everything that falsely claimed authority, John is shown something entirely different: “And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away” (Revelation 21:1).

For centuries, these words have often been understood as a prediction that the present world will someday be destroyed and replaced by another. There may certainly be a cosmic dimension to John’s vision, but throughout this series we have been asking another question as well: What if Scripture is also describing something happening within us? If Revelation is an unveiling of what has been hidden within human consciousness, then the New Heaven and New Earth may describe the result of that unveiling. The old inner world passes away because the person who began the journey is no longer seeing, thinking, feeling, and living in quite the same way. The beasts have been recognized, Babylon has fallen, and the false powers that once ruled from within have begun to lose their throne. Something new can now appear.

The First Heaven and Earth

In biblical symbolism, heaven and earth can be understood as two dimensions of human existence. Heaven represents the invisible realm of spirit, consciousness, understanding, thought, meaning, and inner orientation, while earth represents the visible realm where that consciousness takes form through our actions, relationships, choices, habits, bodies, communities, and daily lives. In this sense, heaven is the inner world from which our outer world continually emerges.

Jesus repeatedly pointed toward this relationship. He taught that what proceeds outwardly from a person first arises inwardly. Anger, compassion, greed, forgiveness, hatred, love, fear, and faith are born in the unseen regions of the heart and mind before they become visible through words and actions. This means there can be no truly new earth without first having a new heaven. We can change governments, institutions, laws, economic systems, churches, organizations, and social structures, and many of those changes may be necessary and beneficial, but eventually the same human tendencies often reappear because the consciousness creating those systems has not fundamentally changed.

Jesus continually directed attention toward the source. He spoke of cleansing the inside of the cup rather than merely polishing its exterior. He warned that outward religious correctness could conceal inward corruption, and he taught that the Kingdom of God was already within and among us. Again and again, Jesus moved attention away from appearance alone and toward the condition of the inner person. If a new world is ever to emerge outwardly, something must first become new within us.

“Behold, I Make All Things New”

John then hears the one seated upon the throne declare, “Behold, I make all things new” (Revelation 21:5). There is something important in the wording. It does not merely say, I make all new things. It says, I make all things new. Spiritual transformation does not necessarily mean escaping our present lives and receiving entirely different circumstances. The same marriage, family, work, body, neighbors, difficulties, responsibilities, and world may remain around us, yet all of them can be experienced differently because the consciousness encountering them has changed.

A person who once experienced criticism only as an attack may begin to see it as an opportunity for self-observation. Someone who previously reacted immediately in anger may begin to discover a small space between the feeling and the response. A person driven by fear may gradually learn trust, while someone who once needed constant recognition may become increasingly comfortable simply doing what is right without needing others to notice. The outer circumstances may remain surprisingly similar, yet the inner world meeting those circumstances has changed dramatically.

This is one way the New Heaven begins to appear. When that changed consciousness begins affecting how we speak, forgive, work, judge, love, spend, serve, and relate to others, the New Heaven begins producing a New Earth. What begins invisibly eventually becomes visible.

The Holy City Comes Down

John then sees something remarkable: “And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven” (Revelation 21:2). The direction is worth noticing. John does not describe humanity abandoning the earth and climbing upward into the New Jerusalem. He sees the holy city coming down from heaven to earth. The divine pattern moves from the unseen into the seen. Spirit becomes embodied.

This closely resembles the words Christians have prayed for centuries in the Lord’s Prayer: “Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven.” Perhaps we have repeated those words many times without recognizing how closely they resemble Revelation’s ending. Heaven and earth are being brought together. The separation between spiritual understanding and everyday living begins to disappear.

We no longer merely believe in love; we become more loving. We no longer merely believe in forgiveness; we begin forgiving. We no longer merely speak about compassion; compassion increasingly appears in the way we respond to people who frustrate, disappoint, or disagree with us. We no longer simply discuss the Kingdom of God as a theological idea; the Kingdom begins taking form through human beings whose inner lives are being transformed. In this sense, incarnation continues wherever the invisible Spirit of God becomes visible through human life.

The Dwelling Place of God

Then comes one of Revelation’s most beautiful statements: “Behold, the tabernacle of God is with men, and he will dwell with them” (Revelation 21:3). The biblical journey has come full circle. In the beginning, humanity encounters God in a Garden. Later God is encountered on mountains, in fire and cloud, within the Tabernacle, inside the Temple, through prophets, and finally through Jesus. After Jesus comes Pentecost, when the Spirit is no longer presented merely as something encountered externally but as something dwelling within humanity.

Now, near Revelation’s conclusion, the separation seems to disappear even further. God dwells with humanity. The sacred is no longer confined to a building, priesthood, ritual, mountain, denomination, institution, or religious system. This does not make churches, worship, Scripture, or religious community meaningless. Rather, the outward forms become expressions of a reality that must also be alive within the person.

The whole person begins to become sacred ground. The spiritual life is no longer something we merely visit on certain days or in certain buildings; it becomes a way of seeing and living.

“There Was No More Sea”

John adds a curious detail when he says that “there was no more sea.” Taken completely literally, this can seem strange. Why would a renewed creation have no oceans? Symbolically, however, the sea frequently represents chaos, instability, danger, and the mysterious depths from which destructive forces can arise. Earlier in Revelation, the beast itself rises out of the sea.

If the beast represents the mechanical, fearful, ego-driven forces within human consciousness, then the disappearance of the sea can take on a deeper meaning. The unconscious chaos no longer rules the person in the same way. This does not mean that emotion, instinct, mystery, or the depths of the psyche disappear. It means those depths are increasingly brought into awareness. What once controlled us from beneath the surface can now be seen.

Many of our reactions begin long before our conscious mind knows what is happening. Someone says something, and anger immediately rises. Another person receives recognition, and jealousy appears. A situation becomes uncertain, and fear takes control. We often explain these reactions only after they have already begun directing our behavior. The work of awakening involves gradually bringing these hidden processes into the light so they no longer rule us unnoticed.

Perhaps this is part of what Revelation means when it says that the sea is gone. The beast loses its hiding place because what once operated unconsciously has been brought into conscious awareness.

Subscribe now

No More Tears

John continues by saying that God will wipe away every tear and that there will be no more death, sorrow, crying, or pain. This does not necessarily mean that a spiritually awakened person will never again experience grief or physical suffering. Jesus himself wept, and genuine compassion may actually make us more sensitive to the suffering of others rather than less.

There is, however, another kind of suffering that can begin to diminish: the suffering created by identification, resentment, wounded pride, fear, comparison, bitterness, and our continual demand that life unfold according to our expectations. Much of human suffering comes not only from what happens to us but from the inner story we construct around what happens. We replay an insult for days, imagine what someone thinks about us, become consumed by what another person received, wish endlessly that the past had been different, or convince ourselves that peace will come only after someone else changes.

As these inner structures lose some of their authority, a certain kind of sorrow really does begin to disappear. The event itself may still be painful, but we no longer automatically add another layer of suffering through resentment, resistance, or identification. Perhaps this is one way God begins wiping away our tears—not always by immediately removing every difficult circumstance, but by transforming the consciousness through which we experience it.

The Death of the Old Self

Revelation speaks repeatedly about death, yet spiritual transformation has always involved a kind of death. Jesus said, “Whosoever will save his life shall lose it: and whosoever will lose his life for my sake shall find it” (Matthew 16:25). Paul spoke of dying to the old self, while Jesus compared spiritual transformation to a grain of wheat falling into the earth and dying so that something greater could emerge. Baptism itself symbolizes death and resurrection.

The personality we have constructed throughout life naturally wants to preserve itself. It prefers familiar reactions, familiar beliefs, familiar identities, and familiar ways of seeing. It wants to remain in control because it has spent a lifetime assuming that it is the rightful ruler of our inner kingdom. Revelation can therefore be read as the story of that false kingdom gradually being exposed. One power after another is revealed, confronted, and removed until the true throne becomes visible.

This connects directly with the strange phrase that eventually gave this entire project its name: Get the King Out of the Garden. Perhaps the king that must leave the Garden is not reason, intelligence, or individuality. It is the false ruler within us—the ego, the mechanical personality, the identified self that assumes it must occupy the throne of consciousness. When that false king begins stepping down, the Garden can begin returning.

The New Jerusalem Is Within and Among Us

John describes the New Jerusalem using extraordinary imagery: walls of precious stones, gates of pearl, streets of gold, and foundations covered with jewels. We can certainly imagine these as descriptions of heavenly beauty, yet these materials can also carry symbolic meaning. Gold must be refined. Pearls form through irritation. Precious stones are created through tremendous forces within the earth.

Perhaps the Holy City is built, in part, from transformed human experience. The experiences we once wished had never happened may eventually become material from which something beautiful is formed. Our wounds can become compassion, our failures can become humility, our disappointments can become understanding, and our mistakes can become wisdom. Even suffering can deepen our ability to recognize the suffering of others.

This does not mean that suffering itself is good or that we should seek it. It means that suffering does not have to be meaningless. What once wounded us can, through transformation, become part of the structure of a wiser and more compassionate human being. Nothing has to be wasted.

The city is therefore not necessarily built from people who never struggled. It may be built from transformed struggle.

No Temple in the City

Then John makes one of his most radical statements: “And I saw no temple therein: for the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb are the temple of it” (Revelation 21:22). For an ancient religious mind, Jerusalem without a Temple would have been almost unimaginable. Yet John’s final vision contains no religious building at the center because there is no longer any need for one particular place where humanity must go to encounter God.

The distinction between sacred and ordinary begins dissolving. The kitchen can become sacred when love is expressed there. The workshop can become sacred when work is done consciously and honestly. A field can become sacred when we recognize the life surrounding us. Caring for another person can become sacred. Sitting quietly beneath a tree can become sacred. Even a difficult conversation can become sacred when we remain present enough to observe what is arising within ourselves instead of immediately reacting.

The spiritual life is no longer something separate from life itself. It becomes the consciousness with which life is lived.

There Is No Night There

John also says that the city has no need of the sun or moon because the glory of God illuminates it, and “there shall be no night there.” Night is the time when we cannot see clearly, and perhaps that is one of Revelation’s deepest themes: learning to see.

The word revelation means unveiling. Something hidden becomes visible. We begin seeing the motives beneath our actions, the fear beneath our anger, the insecurity beneath our need for control, the pride beneath some of our beliefs, and perhaps even the selfishness that can sometimes hide beneath actions we once thought were entirely virtuous. This kind of seeing can initially be uncomfortable because the ego prefers to preserve the image it has created of itself.

Yet the purpose of seeing darkness is not condemnation. It is illumination. We cannot become free from something we are unable or unwilling to see. Once a reaction, motive, fear, or pattern becomes genuinely visible, it begins losing some of its power to operate mechanically.

The night begins ending because consciousness has entered the places where unconsciousness once ruled.

A New Earth Begins Now

It would be easy to place the New Heaven and New Earth entirely in the future and imagine that someday God will repair everything while humanity waits. Yet Jesus repeatedly brought the Kingdom into the present. He said the Kingdom was near, among us, and within us. That suggests that the New Earth does not begin only at the end of history. It begins whenever the old world within a human being starts passing away.

Every time fear loses some of its authority and love becomes stronger, something of the earth becomes new. Every time resentment gives way to forgiveness, every time judgment becomes understanding, every time someone becomes conscious of a mechanical reaction instead of automatically obeying it, and every time compassion becomes stronger than self-interest, a little more of the Kingdom becomes visible in the world.

Perhaps Revelation is therefore not merely telling us what God may someday do for humanity. It may also be revealing what God is already attempting to do within humanity. The transformation begins within individual consciousness and then moves outward through relationships, families, communities, institutions, and eventually the wider world.

The New Heaven comes first because the outer world is continually being created from the inner one.

Almost Back to the Garden

We began this long biblical journey in a Garden. Humanity lived in openness before God, but something entered consciousness that produced division, shame, fear, blame, separation, and eventually violence. From there Scripture carried us through Cain and Abel, Noah, Abraham, Egypt, Moses, the wilderness, kings, prophets, exile, return, Jesus, the Cross, Resurrection, Pentecost, Paul, the Body of Christ, and finally the strange unveiling of Revelation.

Now, as we approach the final pages of the Bible, the imagery becomes surprisingly familiar. There is water again. There is life again. God dwells with humanity again. And most importantly, there is once again a tree.

The Tree of Life that disappeared from humanity’s reach in Genesis appears again in Revelation.

We have traveled through the entire biblical story only to discover that the destination resembles the place where we began. Yet humanity is no longer quite the same. The first Garden represents an innocence that has not yet passed through the long experience of separation, suffering, knowledge, choice, failure, redemption, death, and resurrection. The final Garden may represent something different: innocence regained through consciousness.

We are not simply returning to the beginning.

We are returning to the Garden with eyes opened by the journey.

And perhaps that is what the entire biblical story has been pointing toward.

Coming Next — Part 42: Returning to the Garden: The Completion

In the final part of this series, we will follow Revelation to the River of Life and the Tree of Life, where the Bible’s ending deliberately echoes its beginning. We will return to Eden, but we will ask whether the Garden at the end represents something greater than the Garden at the beginning.

The first Garden may have been innocence without experience. The final Garden may represent innocence joined with awakened consciousness—humanity having passed through separation and returning freely to communion with God.

And there we will finally return to the words that started this entire journey:

Get the King Out of the Garden. The newly transformed king can return.

Next

Share

Leave a comment

The Book of Revelation may be the most misunderstood book in the Bible. For many people, it immediately brings to mind frightening images: beasts rising from the sea, plagues falling upon the earth, armies gathering for battle, stars falling from heaven, the mysterious number 666, and the final destruction of the world. Entire systems of prophecy have been constructed trying to match these symbols with nations, political leaders, technologies, and events in the news. But the very name of the book offers another possibility.

The Greek word apokalypsis, translated Revelation, means an unveiling, an uncovering, or a revealing of something previously hidden. What if Revelation is not primarily about God hiding the future in a complicated code? What if it is about something being uncovered within us?

Throughout this series, we have been looking at Scripture through that inward lens. Egypt became more than an ancient country; it became the state of bondage within us. The wilderness became the place where the old identity is stripped away. Jerusalem became the inner city where God is meant to dwell. The cross became the surrender of the false self, the Resurrection the awakening of a new life, Pentecost the coming of Spirit within humanity, and the Mind of Christ the beginning of an entirely different way of seeing. If that pattern continues, Revelation may be describing what happens when that awakening reaches its deepest levels.

The Revelation of Jesus Christ

The book begins:

“The Revelation of Jesus Christ…”

That phrase can be read in more than one way. It certainly means a revelation given through Jesus Christ. But perhaps it also points toward the revealing of Christ within humanity—the gradual unveiling of what has always been hidden beneath our fear, conditioning, pride, desire, and mechanical reactions.

Jesus had already said:

“The kingdom of God is within you.”
— Luke 17:21

If the Kingdom is within, then perhaps the great struggle preceding its full establishment must also occur within. Revelation then becomes strangely personal. The dragon is not merely somewhere in the world, Babylon is not merely somewhere in history, and the Beast is not merely someone we must identify. These images can also represent forces operating within the human soul. Suddenly the central question changes from “When will these things happen?” to “Where are these things happening in me?”

The Seven Churches — Seven Conditions of the Soul

John first addresses seven churches: Ephesus, Smyrna, Pergamum, Thyatira, Sardis, Philadelphia, and Laodicea. Historically, these were real communities in Asia Minor, but the number seven repeatedly symbolizes completeness in Scripture. Perhaps these churches can also represent different spiritual conditions that exist within us.

One part of us may have lost its first love while another remains faithful under pressure. Another compromises with the world around it, another appears alive outwardly but is spiritually asleep, another has endured patiently, and still another has become lukewarm—neither passionately seeking God nor completely rejecting Him. That sounds remarkably like the inner life.

We are rarely one completely consistent person spiritually. On Monday we may feel deeply connected to God; on Tuesday we become irritated over something insignificant. We may show compassion in one situation and judgment in another. One part of us sincerely wants transformation while another quietly prefers that nothing disturb the comfortable life we already have.

The message repeated to the churches is therefore important:

“He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith…”

The invitation is to hear, to become conscious, and to see our actual condition. Revelation begins not simply with predicting world events, but with self-examination.

The Throne — What Rules Within Us?

John is then taken through an open door in heaven and sees a throne. Throughout Scripture, the throne represents authority. Whoever sits upon the throne rules the kingdom. This raises one of the central spiritual questions we have encountered throughout this series: What is sitting on the throne within me?

We may sincerely say that God rules our lives, yet anger can suddenly take the throne. Fear can take it. Pride, resentment, political identity, religious certainty, money, recognition, security, appetite, or simply the need to be right can occupy that place without our realizing it. The spiritual journey gradually reveals how many false kings have occupied the throne within us, and Revelation can be understood as the story of their removal.

The Beast

Few biblical symbols have generated more speculation than the Beast. Through the centuries, people have identified it with emperors, governments, religious institutions, economic systems, political leaders, computer technology, artificial intelligence, barcodes, credit cards, identification systems, and countless other possibilities. Some historical interpretations may contain truth, because Revelation was certainly written within a political and religious world familiar to its original readers. But the symbol becomes even more powerful when we also allow it to speak inwardly.

A beast lives primarily through instinct, appetite, reaction, domination, and survival, and human beings possess these same forces. When consciousness sleeps, we can become remarkably mechanical. Someone insults us, and anger immediately answers. Someone disagrees with us and defensiveness arises before we have even considered what was said. Desire appears and begins directing our behavior. Fear enters and suddenly controls our imagination. We believe we are choosing, when often something within us has already chosen before conscious thought has even arrived.

The Beast may therefore symbolize humanity when the higher spiritual nature has become subordinate to the lower, reactive nature. The problem is not that we possess instincts, emotions, desires, or even a survival mechanism; all of these belong to human life. The problem comes when these forces occupy the throne and begin ruling the whole person.

The Mark of the Beast

Then comes perhaps the most famous warning in Revelation—the mark placed upon the forehead or the hand. The symbolism itself is striking because the forehead can represent thought while the hand represents action. Seen inwardly, the mark could describe a condition in which both our thinking and our actions have become identified with the same unconscious system.

We think as the world teaches us to think, react as our conditioning has trained us to react, desire what society teaches us to desire, fear what we are told to fear, and sometimes even hate those we have been taught to hate. Because the people around us may be doing much the same thing, it can feel perfectly normal. We may never realize how much of what we call my thinking is actually inherited, absorbed, repeated, and reinforced.

The mark, then, does not necessarily have to be understood only as something externally stamped upon human beings. It may also describe something much subtler: a person whose mind and actions have become completely identified with the consciousness of the surrounding world.

Paul described the opposite condition:

“Be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind.”
— Romans 12:2

Revelation may be presenting that same choice through dramatic symbolic language. Will our thinking and actions arise from unconscious conformity, or from an awakening consciousness increasingly aligned with God?

Subscribe now

666 — The Number of Man

Revelation calls 666 “the number of a man.” Six repeatedly falls short of seven, the biblical number associated with completion, and humanity itself was created on the sixth day. Seven represents completion and rest in God. Perhaps 666 therefore symbolizes humanity multiplied upon itself—human consciousness attempting to become complete without God.

The intellect alone cannot complete us, nor can material achievement, religious identity, technology, power, possessions, or recognition. The ego continually promises that one more accomplishment, one more possession, one more victory, one more experience, or even one more certainty will finally make us whole. Yet six never becomes seven simply by accumulating more sixes. Something remains incomplete until human life reconnects with its Source.

Babylon the Great

Then we encounter Babylon. In the Old Testament, Babylon was the empire that conquered Jerusalem and carried its people into captivity. In Revelation it becomes something much larger: a glittering world system built upon wealth, power, seduction, exploitation, and spiritual corruption. It is easy to look outward and begin identifying governments, corporations, religious organizations, nations, or economic systems as Babylon, and perhaps aspects of Babylon can indeed manifest through all of these.

But Revelation invites us to look deeper because there can also be a Babylon within us. It is the inner civilization we have constructed around the false self—the collection of beliefs, ambitions, fears, attachments, identities, grievances, accomplishments, and desires that gradually tell us who we think we are.

Like ancient Babylon, the personality builds towers. It says, Look what I have accomplished. Look what I know. Look what I own. Look what I believe. Look who I am. Much of this can appear impressive, respectable, and even spiritual. Yet eventually comes the astonishing announcement:

“Babylon is fallen, is fallen…”

The spiritual path gradually dismantles the structure we may have spent much of our lives constructing. What we believed was us begins to loosen. That process can feel like destruction because the personality does not easily surrender what has given it identity and security. But from another perspective, the fall of Babylon is not destruction at all. It is liberation.

“Come Out of Her, My People”

Then comes a voice from heaven:

“Come out of her, my people…”

This may be one of Revelation’s clearest spiritual invitations. It does not necessarily mean physically abandoning civilization, because Jesus did not teach his followers to withdraw from humanity. He taught them how to live within the world without inwardly belonging to its unconscious values.

To come out of Babylon can mean withdrawing our identity from the systems within and around us that previously controlled us. We begin seeing anger rather than simply being angry. We begin observing fear rather than automatically obeying it. We notice our need for approval, our desire to control a conversation, the strange satisfaction that can arise from proving someone else wrong, and how quickly the mind divides humanity into us and them.

Something within us begins stepping outside the machinery. There appears a small space between the impression we receive and the reaction that once followed automatically. We can see the reaction arising without immediately becoming it. That small space between seeing a reaction and becoming the reaction may be one of the first beginnings of genuine spiritual freedom.

Armageddon — The Inner Battle

Eventually Revelation brings us to Armageddon. Millions have wondered where and when this final battle will occur, but anyone who has seriously attempted inner transformation already knows something about Armageddon. There comes a conflict between the person we have been and the person we are becoming.

Jesus acknowledged this struggle when he said:

“The spirit indeed is willing, but the flesh is weak.”

Paul described it even more personally:

“For the good that I would I do not: but the evil which I would not, that I do.”

The ancient spiritual teachers understood something that modern psychology would later rediscover: the human being is divided. One part wants God while another wants comfort. One part wants forgiveness while another wants revenge. One part seeks humility while another longs for recognition. One part wants truth while another desperately wants its existing beliefs to remain true.

Armageddon may therefore represent the point at which these opposing kingdoms can no longer peacefully coexist. As consciousness grows, the contradictions become increasingly visible. Eventually something must surrender the throne.

The Dragon Cast Down

The great dragon is eventually defeated, and Revelation identifies the dragon with “that old serpent,” deliberately taking us all the way back to Genesis. That is an extraordinary connection. The Bible begins with a serpent in a garden and approaches its conclusion with that same serpent finally losing its power. The pattern has come full circle.

What began as separation in Eden—human consciousness turning away from divine guidance and becoming increasingly dominated by self-consciousness—must eventually be healed. The serpent cannot simply be defeated through external religion or merely by believing the correct doctrine. Its influence has to be recognized within consciousness itself.

Every time we observe the false self without automatically feeding it, its authority weakens. Every time we choose compassion over retaliation, truth over self-deception, humility over pride, or conscious awareness over mechanical reaction, another small portion of the old serpent’s power is lost. This battle is not won by hating ourselves or trying to destroy the human personality. It is won by bringing what has been unconscious into the light of consciousness.

The Judgment

Revelation then describes the great judgment before the throne of God. Traditional Christianity often pictures this exclusively as a future courtroom scene in which every human being stands before God. There may indeed be realities beyond this life that we cannot presently understand, but judgment also has an immediate spiritual meaning.

Judgment involves discernment and separation. Light reveals what darkness concealed. As consciousness grows within us, things previously hidden begin to become visible. We recognize motives we once justified, selfishness hiding beneath apparent generosity, pride hiding beneath religious certainty, fear beneath anger, and insecurity beneath our desire to control people or circumstances.

This kind of judgment can be uncomfortable because real self-knowledge often is. Yet its purpose need not be understood primarily as punishment. It is revelation. Jesus said:

“For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved.”

The light does not create what is hidden; it simply reveals what was already there. And that is precisely what Revelation means. What has been concealed is brought into the light where it can finally be seen and transformed.

The Book of Life

Then books are opened, including the Book of Life. Perhaps we should resist the temptation to imagine God merely keeping a gigantic celestial ledger of good and bad behavior. What if the Book of Life also represents something deeper—the truth of what we have actually become?

Every repeated thought shapes us. Every choice, act of compassion, resentment we nurture, truth we accept, and reaction we either blindly follow or consciously observe leaves something within us. Each time we become conscious instead of reacting mechanically, something changes in our being. In that sense, we are continually writing ourselves, and eventually what is repeatedly written becomes part of who we are.

The question may therefore be deeper than whether our name appears in a book somewhere in heaven. Perhaps we should also ask: How much Life has been written into us? How much of the life of Christ—love, compassion, forgiveness, courage, humility, truth, and awareness—has actually become part of our nature?

Death and Hell Are Cast Away

One of Revelation’s most remarkable images appears near the end:

“And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire.”

Even death itself eventually disappears. Something is being completed. The consciousness that began in fear, separation, mortality, and self-preservation is giving way to another kind of life. Paul had written, “The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death.”

Perhaps the deepest meaning of death is not limited to physical death. It may also include the consciousness that experiences itself as completely separate from God, from others, and from the deeper Life within creation. Jesus repeatedly called humanity into another quality of existence—what he called eternal life. Perhaps eternal life means more than life that continues endlessly after physical death. It may mean a life that begins to participate in the Eternal even now.

Revelation Is Not Meant to Frighten Us

Seen this way, Revelation becomes far less about terror and far more about transformation. The frightening images remain because genuine transformation can indeed feel frightening to the ego. Everything upon which the false self has constructed its kingdom is being shaken. Babylon falls, the Beast loses authority, the dragon is cast down, the false kingdoms collapse, and even death itself disappears.

From the perspective of the ego, this may look like the end of the world—and perhaps, in one sense, it is the end of its world. But what follows is not annihilation. Something entirely new appears.

John says:

“And I saw a new heaven and a new earth…”

The destruction was never the final destination. Transformation was. Perhaps this is one of the great messages hidden within Revelation: God is not ultimately destroying creation. God is making all things new, and that includes us.

The entire biblical journey—from the Garden, through slavery, wilderness, kingdoms, exile, prophets, Jesus, the cross, Resurrection, Spirit, and finally Revelation—has been moving toward this moment. What began in the Garden is approaching its completion. The false kingdom collapses, the true King returns to the throne, and the Garden begins to appear again.

Coming Next — Part 41: A New Heaven and a New Earth

John’s vision does not end with destruction. It ends with restoration. The old heaven and earth pass away, the Holy City descends, tears are wiped away, death disappears, and God declares, “Behold, I make all things new.”

But what if the New Heaven and New Earth are not only descriptions of a future world? What if they also describe what happens when our inner heaven—our consciousness—and our inner earth—our lived life—are transformed? In Part 41, we will explore The New Heaven and the New Earth: A New Consciousness and a New Way of Living.

If what you’ve been reading has helped you see yourself or these ideas a little more clearly, perhaps someone you know would benefit from it too. If so, please consider hitting the Share button. You never know—you may help someone else begin seeing themselves, their reactions, and their journey in a new way.

Next

If you would like these stories in order, just go to GetTheKingOutOfTheGarden.com

Share

Leave a comment

In the previous article, we looked at Paul’s image of humanity as the Body of Christ—many members, many gifts, many functions, yet one living body. But a body needs more than individual parts. It needs something that coordinates them. It needs a mind.

Paul makes an extraordinary statement:

“But we have the mind of Christ.” — 1 Corinthians 2:16

For many years I might have read those words as meaning that Christians are supposed to learn what Jesus believed and then try to think the same way. There is certainly truth in that, but I have come to believe Paul may be pointing toward something much deeper. The Mind of Christ is not merely knowing about Jesus or agreeing with certain doctrines about Him. It is a transformation in the very place from which we see, judge, respond, and live.

It is possible to know the Bible very well and still react from anger, fear, pride, tribal loyalty, resentment, or self-interest. We may quote Jesus while responding to another person in ways completely unlike Jesus. The Mind of Christ therefore cannot simply mean possessing correct religious information. It must involve a change in consciousness—a transformation not only in what we think, but in the part of us from which our thoughts and reactions arise.

A Different Way of Seeing

Jesus continually saw people differently from those around Him. Religious leaders saw a sinful woman; Jesus saw a human being capable of transformation. Others saw a despised tax collector; Jesus saw Zacchaeus. The disciples saw troublesome children; Jesus saw the Kingdom of Heaven reflected in them. Society saw lepers, Samaritans, foreigners, enemies, failures, and outcasts. Jesus repeatedly looked beyond the label and encountered the person.

This may be one of the clearest signs of the Mind of Christ: it sees beneath appearances. Our ordinary mind divides the world very quickly into friend or enemy, good person or bad person, conservative or liberal, believer or unbeliever, worthy or unworthy, right or wrong. Sometimes distinctions are necessary, of course, but trouble begins when the label becomes the whole person. Once that happens, compassion can disappear because we are no longer truly seeing the human being before us.

Jesus seemed able to recognize what was wrong without reducing a person to what was wrong with them. He could confront hypocrisy strongly while still seeking restoration. He could disagree without hatred. He could see the sin without losing sight of the soul. Perhaps having the Mind of Christ means learning to do the same.

“Let This Mind Be in You”

Paul writes:

“Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus.” — Philippians 2:5

The verses that follow describe humility. Christ does not grasp for status or superiority but empties Himself and takes the form of a servant. That tells us something important about the kind of mind Paul is describing. The Mind of Christ is not obsessed with proving itself right. It is not constantly defending its importance. It does not need to dominate every conversation, defeat every opponent, or receive recognition.

The ordinary ego tends to ask, How does this affect me? What will people think of me? Am I winning? Am I respected? The Mind of Christ asks something quite different: What is true? What is loving? What serves the whole? What is mine to do?

This is not weakness. Jesus could be remarkably forceful when necessary. He overturned tables, challenged religious authorities, and refused to compromise truth merely to keep people comfortable. Yet even His strength did not seem to arise from wounded pride. He was not defending an insecure personal identity. That difference may be crucial.

The Mind That Reacts and the Mind That Responds

Most of us discover, if we watch ourselves carefully, how quickly reactions arise. Someone criticizes us and an answer forms almost instantly. Someone disagrees politically or religiously, and we begin constructing an argument before they have finished speaking. Someone hurts us, and the mind begins replaying the event, defending ourselves and judging them. Much of this happens so quickly that we assume the reaction simply is us.

Sometimes the reaction may even be justified. But something important can happen if there is a small space between the event and our response. In that space we might ask, What is happening inside me right now? Why am I so threatened by this? Am I responding to what this person actually said, or to something inside myself? What would love see here that my first reaction does not?

This does not mean suppressing anger, denying injustice, or pretending everything is acceptable. Jesus certainly did none of those things. It means that the first automatic reaction does not necessarily have to become the final response. There can be a moment in which we actually see what is occurring within us before it takes control. In that moment, another possibility appears. There is room for another kind of seeing, and perhaps that is one doorway into the Mind of Christ.

And here is a little preview of where we will be going after this present series is completed: we will begin exploring much more practically how we can become aware of these mostly unconscious reactions and gradually gain some freedom from being controlled by them. It is one thing to say that we should respond differently; it is another thing entirely to learn how to observe what is happening within ourselves while it is actually happening.

The Renewal of the Mind

Paul describes this transformation elsewhere:

“Be transformed by the renewing of your mind.” — Romans 12:2

Notice that he does not merely say, learn more information. He says be transformed. Transformation means that the person doing the seeing begins to change.

Our minds have been shaped by family, culture, religion, politics, fears, wounds, successes, failures, and countless experiences we may barely remember. We inherit assumptions about how the world works and then easily mistake those assumptions for reality itself. Jesus repeatedly challenged these inherited ways of seeing. Again and again He began with some version of, “You have heard that it was said…” and then followed with, “But I say unto you…”

He moved beneath the external rule toward the inward condition. Murder became connected with anger. Adultery became connected with desire. Loving one’s neighbor expanded into loving one’s enemy. Religious purity gave way to purity of heart. The transformation was moving inward. The Kingdom was moving inward. Eventually even the law was to be written upon the heart.

The Mind of Christ may be the consciousness that begins to perceive life from that inward Kingdom.

Christ Consciousness Is Not Spiritual Superiority

There is a danger here that is worth recognizing. Whenever human beings encounter spiritual ideas, the ego can quietly claim them for itself. A person can begin thinking, I have the Mind of Christ. I understand what others do not. Ironically, the very claim can become evidence that we have moved away from it.

The Mind of Christ does not seem to produce spiritual arrogance. Jesus washed feet. He ate with people religious society rejected. He repeatedly warned against seeking the highest seats and being admired for religious performance. The more deeply a person begins to see, the more aware he may become of how incomplete his own understanding still is.

Perhaps one sign of spiritual maturity is the ability to say, “I may be wrong.” That does not mean abandoning conviction. It means holding conviction without making our own present understanding identical with God. There is an enormous difference between saying, “This is what I presently believe to be true,” and saying, “God sees everything exactly as I do.” History shows how dangerous the second assumption can become.

Seeing the Divine Image in Others

Jesus taught that what we do to “the least of these,” we somehow do to Him. That teaching becomes astonishing when taken seriously because it suggests that Christ is not merely someone we worship from a distance. Christ is also somehow encountered in the human being standing before us—the difficult neighbor, the stranger, the poor, the prisoner, the person whose beliefs disturb us, and even the enemy.

This does not mean that everyone behaves rightly or that destructive behavior should be tolerated. Love sometimes requires boundaries, confrontation, justice, or separation. Jesus Himself confronted wrongdoing. But even then, another human being does not cease to carry the image of God.

The ordinary mind asks whether someone deserves love. The Mind of Christ seems to begin somewhere deeper. Love is not merely a reward given to those who deserve it; it becomes a condition of consciousness from which we meet the world.

From Believing in Christ to Allowing Christ to Live Through Us

This entire series has gradually been moving toward an important distinction. Christianity can become primarily a religion about Jesus—believing certain things about His birth, death, resurrection, divinity, and return. Those beliefs may be deeply meaningful. But the New Testament repeatedly pushes us beyond belief about Christ toward something much more intimate: Christ in you, the Spirit dwelling within you, the Kingdom of God within you, the law written upon the heart, the Body of Christ made of human beings, and now Paul’s remarkable statement, “We have the Mind of Christ.”

The direction is unmistakably inward.

The question gradually changes from Do I believe in Jesus? to something even more demanding: Is the life of Jesus becoming visible through me? Can I forgive more freely? Can I see another person without immediately judging them? Can I remain compassionate while still recognizing wrongdoing? Can I tell the truth without hatred? Can I disagree without needing to destroy the person with whom I disagree? Can I become less controlled by fear, pride, resentment, and the need to be right?

These questions may tell us more about our actual spiritual condition than how many theological answers we have memorized.

Who Is Sitting on the Throne?

There is another way of expressing this. Something is always governing our inner life. At different times fear may sit on the throne, or anger, pride, woundedness, political identity, religious certainty, the desire for approval, or simply habit. Whatever occupies that inner throne influences what we notice, what we believe about what is happening, and how we respond.

The spiritual journey may therefore involve repeatedly noticing what has taken control and allowing something deeper to return to its rightful place. Jesus called it seeking first the Kingdom of God. Paul called it being led by the Spirit. Elsewhere Scripture speaks of putting on the new man. Here Paul calls it possessing the Mind of Christ.

Different language may be describing aspects of the same inward transformation: the ordinary, reactive self is no longer the unquestioned ruler of the inner world.

The Mind of Christ in Daily Life

Perhaps this teaching becomes most meaningful when we bring it out of theology and into ordinary life. Someone speaks sharply to me, and I feel the reaction rise. For a moment, perhaps I can see it before I become completely identified with it. I can listen. I can ask what is really happening. I can decide whether anything needs to be said at all.

Someone disagrees with something deeply important to me and my mind immediately begins preparing its defense. But perhaps I can first hear the person—not merely wait for my turn to speak, but actually hear. Someone behaves badly, and I may need to confront the behavior, but I do not necessarily have to hate the person. Someone suffers and, instead of immediately explaining why their suffering is their own fault, perhaps compassion can arise first.

These moments may seem insignificant compared with great religious experiences, but this is where spiritual transformation becomes real. The Mind of Christ is tested in traffic, at the dinner table, in political conversations, in church disagreements, in family conflict, in disappointment, and in the quiet thoughts we never speak aloud. That is where the Kingdom either begins to become flesh in us—or remains only an idea.

Becoming What We Have Been Seeking

At the beginning of the spiritual journey, God often seems to be somewhere outside us. We search upward and outward through books, churches, teachers, doctrines, experiences, and traditions. All of those may help us. But eventually Scripture begins pointing toward a mystery: the One we have been seeking has also been working within us.

The Kingdom is within. The Spirit is within. Christ is within. And the mind itself can be renewed.

Perhaps salvation is therefore more than being rescued from something after death. Perhaps it also includes being gradually liberated from the unconscious patterns that prevent us from loving, seeing, and living as Christ did. The Mind of Christ is not something we manufacture simply by trying harder to be religious. It emerges as the old mind loosens its grip—as fear gives way to trust, judgment gives way to understanding, pride gives way to humility, and automatic reaction gradually gives way to conscious response.

We do not become Jesus. But something of the consciousness revealed through Jesus can begin to awaken within us. Perhaps that has been the invitation all along: not merely to worship the Light, but to allow that Light to illuminate the mind through which we see ourselves, one another, and the world.

A Question to Carry With Us

As we move through the coming days, perhaps we can begin watching ourselves without condemnation and simply ask: What is seeing through me right now? Is it fear? Resentment? Pride? Habit? A wound from the past? Or, just for a moment, can I see this person and this situation through something closer to the Mind of Christ?

That small moment of awareness may be where transformation begins.

Coming Next: Part 40 — Revelation: The Unveiling Within

The word Revelation carries the meaning of an unveiling—something previously hidden becoming visible. Rather than beginning with Revelation only as a timetable of disasters occurring somewhere outside us, we will explore another possibility: that this strange and powerful book can also describe an unveiling taking place within human consciousness.

The beasts, the dragon, Babylon, judgment, the Lamb, and ultimately the New Jerusalem may reveal an inner struggle between an old order of consciousness and the birth of something entirely new. And as we begin that final movement of the series, we will also begin making our way back toward the place where this entire journey started: In the Garden.

Next

Share

Leave a comment

In the last part, we explored the Gifts of the Spirit—the many different ways the Spirit may work through human beings. Paul’s teaching naturally leads to another of his most powerful images: the Body of Christ.

Paul writes:

“For as the body is one, and hath many members, and all the members of that one body, being many, are one body: so also is Christ.”
— 1 Corinthians 12:12

At first glance, this may seem like a simple illustration about the church. Different people have different roles, just as a body has hands, feet, eyes, and ears. But Paul may be pointing toward something much deeper than organizational cooperation. What if the Body of Christ is an image of spiritual unity itself? What if Christ is not only someone we follow from outside ourselves, but also a pattern of divine life awakening within humanity? Then Paul’s metaphor becomes enormous. Humanity may be far more connected than we ordinarily realize.

One Body, Many Members

Every human body contains trillions of cells. Each cell performs a particular function, yet no healthy cell exists entirely for itself. A heart cell cannot decide that the rest of the body is irrelevant. A lung cannot declare independence from the bloodstream. A hand cannot survive separated from the body. The health of each part depends upon the health of the whole.

Paul uses essentially this same insight when he says, “And the eye cannot say unto the hand, I have no need of thee” (1 Corinthians 12:21). The message appears simple: we need one another. Yet the implications go far beyond church life.

Modern society often teaches us to think primarily as separate individuals. We compete for resources, recognition, money, influence, status, and security. We construct identities around race, nationality, religion, politics, social class, education, and countless other distinctions. These categories may have practical value, but they can also hide something more fundamental. Before we are Republicans or Democrats, Americans or Europeans, Christians or Muslims, wealthy or poor, educated or uneducated, we are human beings sharing the same fragile planet. We breathe the same atmosphere, depend upon the same ecosystems, and experience love, fear, grief, hope, pain, and longing.

We are separate, yet deeply interconnected. Paul’s body imagery may be inviting us to recognize that difference does not cancel unity.

Unity Does Not Mean Sameness

One of the most important aspects of Paul’s metaphor is that the body requires diversity. If every part were an eye, there would be no hearing. If every part were an ear, there would be no smelling. Paul asks, “If the whole body were an eye, where were the hearing?” (1 Corinthians 12:17). A healthy body does not eliminate differences; it coordinates them.

This is a profound spiritual lesson because human beings often confuse unity with conformity. We imagine that peace will come when everyone believes the same things, worships the same way, belongs to the same group, or interprets Scripture exactly as we do. But a body made entirely of identical organs would not be healthy. It would be impossible.

Perhaps humanity’s diversity is not an unfortunate obstacle God must somehow overcome. Perhaps diversity is part of the design. Different cultures may perceive different aspects of human experience. Different personalities contribute different gifts. Different generations see different problems. Different spiritual traditions may emphasize different dimensions of humanity’s relationship with the Divine. Unity does not require erasing those differences. It requires learning how those differences can serve the whole.

When One Part Suffers

Paul makes another remarkable statement:

“And whether one member suffer, all the members suffer with it; or one member be honoured, all the members rejoice with it.”
— 1 Corinthians 12:26

Anyone who has injured a finger knows how true this is physically. A tiny wound can affect the entire body. The nervous system responds, attention shifts, other muscles compensate, and sleep may be disturbed. The whole organism participates in the pain.

Paul seems to suggest that human community works similarly. When one portion of humanity suffers, the consequences rarely remain isolated. Poverty creates instability. War produces refugees. Despair can produce violence. Environmental damage crosses borders. Fear spreads, and hatred spreads, but compassion, kindness, courage, new ideas, and healing spread too. What happens in one portion of the human family eventually affects others in ways we may never fully see.

The Body of Christ therefore challenges the illusion that another person’s suffering is completely unrelated to us. The wounded stranger is not entirely separate. He is another part of the body.

Jesus Expanded the Meaning of Neighbor

This same principle appears repeatedly in Jesus’ teaching. When someone asked Him, “Who is my neighbour?”, Jesus responded with the parable of the Good Samaritan. The Samaritan was from a group viewed with suspicion and hostility by many of Jesus’ listeners, yet Jesus made him the example of compassion. The neighbor was not simply the person from our tribe; the neighbor was the person before us who needed mercy.

Jesus pushed this even further when He said, “Love your enemies” (Matthew 5:44). That command makes little sense if humanity consists only of separate competing individuals, but it becomes more understandable if humanity is one interconnected spiritual organism. Hatred directed toward another member of the body ultimately wounds the body itself.

This does not mean ignoring injustice or refusing to confront harmful behavior. A healthy body sometimes must fight infection, stop bleeding, or remove something dangerous. But healing remains the goal. The purpose is restoration, not hatred.

“You Are the Body of Christ”

Paul eventually makes the image personal:

“Now ye are the body of Christ, and members in particular.”
— 1 Corinthians 12:27

Notice what he does not say. He does not merely say, You belong to an organization called Christianity. He says, “You are the body of Christ.” That is a much stronger statement.

What might it mean spiritually? Perhaps it means that Christ continues entering the world through human beings. When someone feeds the hungry, the hands of Christ are working. When someone comforts a grieving person, the compassion of Christ becomes visible. When someone forgives, reconciliation enters the world. When someone speaks truth despite personal cost, courage becomes embodied. When someone protects the vulnerable, love takes physical form.

Christ is no longer only a figure walking through Galilee two thousand years ago. The pattern of Christ continues whenever divine love becomes embodied in human action.

Christ Within

Paul repeatedly uses another striking phrase: “Christ in you, the hope of glory” (Colossians 1:27). Traditional Christianity often emphasizes Christ as someone to believe in, and Paul certainly teaches that. But he also speaks repeatedly about Christ being within.

This opens an important symbolic dimension. Perhaps Christ represents the divine image awakening within the human being—the deeper self aligned with God rather than the ego-centered self that normally governs our lives. Jesus says, “I am the vine, ye are the branches” (John 15:5). A branch does not imitate the vine from a distance. The same life flows through both.

This may be one of the deepest meanings behind the Body of Christ. The spiritual life is not merely imitation; it is participation. We do not simply ask, What would Jesus do? Eventually the deeper question becomes: Can the same Spirit that moved through Jesus begin moving through me?

The False King and the Living Body

This connects strongly with the image we have returned to throughout this series: the inner struggle over what sits upon the throne of consciousness. The ego tends to experience itself as separate and preoccupied with my interests, my reputation, my beliefs, my possessions, my fears, and my grievances. The false king builds walls because separation protects its identity.

But the Body of Christ points in the opposite direction. The deeper consciousness begins recognizing connection. The other person is no longer merely a competitor, inconvenience, enemy, stranger, or category. Something within us begins to see another human being. And sometimes, if we are quiet enough, something even deeper recognizes that there is life in that person that comes from the same Source as the life in us.

This does not erase personality. The hand remains a hand, and the eye remains an eye, but neither mistakes itself for the whole body. Perhaps getting the false king out of the Garden allows us to rediscover that we were never the entire kingdom. We are part of something far larger.

The Church as Body — and Its Temptation

Historically, Christians have understandably interpreted the Body of Christ primarily as the church. There is truth in that. A spiritual community can become a living organism in which people support, teach, encourage, challenge, and care for one another.

But there is also a danger. The metaphor intended to reveal interconnectedness can itself become another boundary. We can begin thinking, We are the Body of Christ, and they are outside it.

Yet Jesus repeatedly crossed the boundaries religious communities created. He ate with tax collectors, spoke with Samaritans, touched lepers, defended people regarded as sinful, and praised the faith of outsiders. His ministry continually enlarged the circle.

Perhaps the mature understanding of the Body of Christ must do the same. Instead of asking only, “Who belongs inside our body?”, perhaps we should ask, “How far does divine life extend?” The answer may be larger than our institutions.

The Least Members Matter Most

Paul makes another statement that turns ordinary human hierarchy upside down:

“Nay, much more those members of the body, which seem to be more feeble, are necessary.”
— 1 Corinthians 12:22

That sounds very much like Jesus. The world tends to honor strength, wealth, beauty, achievement, intelligence, and influence, but Paul says the parts that appear weaker may actually be indispensable.

This radically changes the way we evaluate human worth. A person does not become more valuable because they are productive, nor do they become less valuable because they are elderly, disabled, poor, sick, unnoticed, or unable to contribute economically. If humanity is a living body, every member possesses inherent dignity.

Sometimes the supposedly weaker members even reveal something the stronger members have forgotten. They teach patience, compassion, dependence, humility, care, and love without usefulness attached to it. Perhaps a society reveals its spiritual maturity not by how it treats its strongest citizens but by how it treats those from whom it expects nothing in return.

Spiritual Gifts Make Sense Only Within the Body

This is why Paul’s teaching about the Body of Christ comes directly after his discussion of spiritual gifts. A gift makes little sense by itself. An eye exists because there is a body that needs sight. A hand exists because something must be touched, lifted, carried, repaired, or protected.

Likewise, wisdom exists because someone needs guidance. Teaching exists because someone needs understanding. Mercy exists because someone is hurting. Leadership exists because people need direction. Giving exists because someone lacks something. Healing exists because something is wounded.

The gift and the need belong together. Seen this way, discovering our purpose may not require uncovering some grand hidden destiny. Sometimes purpose is simply what happens when our gift meets another person’s need.

The Body Must Learn to Feel

One reason humanity continues hurting itself may be that we have not yet fully developed the ability to feel ourselves as one body. Imagine if your hand could injure your foot but never feel the pain. It might continue causing damage indefinitely.

Something similar happens in societies. When suffering is distant enough, it can become an abstraction—numbers on a screen, statistics in a report, people somewhere else. But compassion reconnects the nervous system of humanity. Suddenly the suffering person becomes real. We see a face, hear a story, and recognize a parent, child, neighbor, or friend. The pain enters our awareness.

Perhaps compassion is one of the ways the Body of Christ begins developing spiritual sensation. We learn to feel what previously remained invisible.

What We Do to Others, We Do to Christ

Jesus expresses this connection in one of His most challenging teachings:

“Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me.”
— Matthew 25:40

He identifies Himself with the hungry, the thirsty, the stranger, the naked, the sick, and the imprisoned. This is extraordinary. Jesus does not merely say, Help them because I told you to. He says, in effect, I am there.

Perhaps this is one of the clearest expressions of the Body of Christ. Christ is encountered in the other, especially in the person we might otherwise overlook. This means spirituality can never remain entirely private. Meditation, prayer, worship, Scripture, and contemplation may awaken us inwardly, but eventually something must move outward. The awakened heart recognizes the sacred in another human being.

Subscribe now

Humanity Awakening to Itself

Perhaps the Body of Christ can also symbolize something still unfolding. Humanity may be slowly awakening to the realization that we truly are one interconnected species.

For most of human history, communities existed largely separated from one another. Today, a message can travel around the world in seconds. Events thousands of miles away can affect our economy, environment, health, and security almost immediately. Technology has connected humanity externally faster than consciousness has connected us internally. We have created something resembling a global nervous system, but we have not yet fully learned how to become a global spiritual community.

That may be one of humanity’s great challenges. Can our consciousness catch up with our technology? Can we learn to think not only as individuals, nations, religions, or political tribes, but as members of one human family? Perhaps this is part of what the ancient symbol of the Body of Christ has been pointing toward all along.

Individuality Within Unity

There is another beautiful paradox here. Spiritual awakening does not erase individuality. The goal is not to dissolve into some featureless collective. A healthy body depends upon each organ performing its unique function, and spiritual unity may actually allow individuality to flourish more fully.

When we no longer need to compete constantly for identity or superiority, we become freer to express the gift that is genuinely ours. The violin does not need to become the trumpet, and the trumpet does not need to imitate the drum. Each contributes something different to the music. The harmony exists because the instruments remain distinct.

Perhaps this is how the Divine expresses itself through creation: one Source, countless expressions.

The Body Is Still Growing

Paul’s image also suggests that the Body of Christ is not finished. Humanity is still learning, still stumbling, still dividing, and still awakening. We should not be surprised that spiritual development appears messy.

A child learning to walk falls repeatedly. A body healing from injury may experience pain. Human consciousness may likewise be undergoing a long process of development. Perhaps the Kingdom of God is not simply something that suddenly descends upon humanity from outside. Perhaps it also grows within humanity as more individuals awaken to compassion, truth, responsibility, and interconnectedness.

Jesus compared the Kingdom to a mustard seed—something tiny that becomes something enormous. Maybe every act of genuine love contributes another living cell to that growing reality.

A Different Way of Seeing the World

If we truly believed we were members of one body, much of life would look different. Competition would not disappear, but it would lose its cruelty. Success would not require another person’s failure. Compassion would cease being optional. Justice would become a form of healing, forgiveness would become restoration, and service would become natural.

Perhaps even disagreement would change. Two parts of the same body can perform very different functions without becoming enemies. What if we learned to disagree while still recognizing one another as members of the same human family? That alone would represent an enormous spiritual awakening.

The Christ Pattern

Perhaps “Christ” can be understood not only as a name but also as a pattern. Jesus embodied a way of being centered in love, compassion, truth, forgiveness, courage, humility, and union with God. That pattern can awaken within others.

One candle lights another without losing its flame. One life awakens another. The Body of Christ therefore may not be merely a collection of people who believe certain doctrines. It may also be the emerging community of those through whom the Christ pattern is becoming embodied.

Whenever compassion overcomes cruelty, the Body moves. Whenever forgiveness overcomes vengeance, the Body heals. Whenever truth overcomes deception, the Body sees more clearly. Whenever service overcomes selfishness, the Body grows stronger. Whenever love overcomes fear, Christ becomes visible again.

The Garden Is Larger Than We Thought

Throughout this series, the Garden has represented the inner field of consciousness—the place where thoughts, fears, desires, reactions, and deeper awareness meet. But perhaps eventually we discover that the Garden is not entirely private.

My inner life influences how I treat you. Your inner life influences how you treat someone else. Every reaction sends something outward, and every act of compassion does too. The inner Garden and the outer world are connected.

When the false king rules within, separation spreads outward. When love, awareness, and compassion rule within, something different enters the world. Perhaps this is how the Body of Christ grows: one awakened relationship at a time, one merciful response at a time, one person recognizing another person as part of the same living whole.

The Question Changes

Early in the spiritual journey we may ask, “How can I be saved?” Later the question may become, “How can I awaken?” But eventually perhaps an even larger question appears: “How can my awakening serve the whole?”

That may be where the Body of Christ becomes more than theology. It becomes practice. We begin realizing that our spiritual development is not merely about ourselves. If one member becomes more compassionate, the body gains compassion. If one member becomes more truthful, the body gains truth. If one member becomes more peaceful, peace has entered the world somewhere it did not exist before.

None of us can heal the entire world, but every one of us influences the portion of the body we touch. Perhaps that is enough. Perhaps that is how the Kingdom grows—not through one giant transformation forced upon humanity from above, but through millions of smaller awakenings spreading through the living body of humanity.

And eventually we may discover what Paul seemed to see nearly two thousand years ago:

We are many, yet beneath all our differences, we are one.

The Mind of Christ is next,

Next

If what you’ve been reading has helped you see yourself or these ideas a little more clearly, perhaps someone you know would benefit from it too. If so, please consider hitting the Share button. You never know—you may help someone else begin seeing themselves, their reactions, and their journey in a new way.

Share

Leave a comment

In the last part, we looked at the Fruit of the Spirit—love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control. These describe something being formed within us. They are signs that the inner soil is changing and that the Spirit is gradually transforming the character of the person.

The Gifts of the Spirit, however, point in a somewhat different direction. If the fruit describes what the Spirit produces within us, the gifts describe what the Spirit may accomplish through us.

Paul writes:

“Now there are diversities of gifts, but the same Spirit.”
— 1 Corinthians 12:4

This distinction is important. Spiritual growth is not simply becoming a better person privately. Something awakened within us eventually seeks expression. Compassion wants to help. Wisdom wants to speak. Faith wants to encourage. Healing wants to restore. Discernment wants to recognize what is true. The Spirit moves inwardly, but eventually that movement begins flowing outward into the world.

And perhaps this is where the gifts truly begin.

One Spirit, Many Expressions

Paul gives one of the best-known descriptions of spiritual gifts in 1 Corinthians 12. He mentions wisdom, knowledge, faith, healing, miracles, prophecy, discernment of spirits, tongues, and interpretation of tongues. Elsewhere Scripture gives somewhat different lists. Romans 12 includes serving, teaching, encouragement, giving, leadership, and mercy. Ephesians speaks of apostles, prophets, evangelists, pastors, and teachers.

That variety itself may be telling us something.

Perhaps Paul was never attempting to create one permanent, exhaustive catalog of supernatural abilities. Instead, he may have been illustrating a much larger principle: the Spirit does not express itself through every person in exactly the same way.

Paul compares humanity to a body. The eye is not the hand. The hand is not the foot. Each serves a different purpose, yet all belong to one living organism.

“For as the body is one, and hath many members… so also is Christ.”
— 1 Corinthians 12:12

This image reaches far beyond church organization. It suggests that spiritual unity does not require sameness. In fact, genuine unity may depend upon difference. One person sees what another misses. One comforts while another teaches. One organizes while another inspires. One quietly serves while another speaks publicly. The Spirit may reveal itself differently because humanity itself is wonderfully diverse.

The problem begins when one part of the body decides that its gift is more important than everyone else’s.

A Gift Is Not Something We Possess

The language of a gift contains an important spiritual lesson. A gift is received; it is not manufactured by the ego.

Paul repeatedly warns against spiritual pride because spiritual ability can easily become another possession of the false self. The moment we begin thinking, I have special wisdom. I have special insight. God speaks through me. I possess spiritual power, something subtle can happen. The gift that was intended to flow through us can become another decoration for the ego.

This may explain why Paul immediately follows his teaching about spiritual gifts with one of the most famous passages in Scripture: 1 Corinthians 13—the chapter on love.

He says that even if he speaks with extraordinary spiritual eloquence, understands mysteries, possesses tremendous faith, or performs remarkable acts, without love it ultimately amounts to nothing.

That placement is probably not accidental.

Spiritual ability is not necessarily evidence of spiritual maturity.

Love is.

This gives us an important safeguard when examining anything claimed to be a spiritual gift. Does it produce humility, compassion, service, truth, and love? Or does it produce superiority, fear, control, division, and fascination with the person supposedly possessing the gift?

The fruit helps us judge the gift.

Wisdom and Knowledge

Paul distinguishes between a “word of wisdom” and a “word of knowledge.” Exactly what he intended has been debated for centuries, but spiritually these gifts may point toward two different ways of knowing.

Knowledge gathers information. Wisdom recognizes what that information means and how it should be used.

A person may know Scripture extremely well yet have little wisdom. Another person may possess very little formal education yet somehow see deeply into human nature. Sometimes a simple sentence spoken at the right moment carries more truth than an hour-long theological argument.

We have probably all experienced moments when an insight seems to arrive almost complete. We did not reason our way toward it step by step. Suddenly we simply see something.

Perhaps spiritual wisdom sometimes works this way. Instead of the mind endlessly constructing answers, something deeper becomes quiet enough to perceive.

Jesus repeatedly demonstrated this kind of perception. People attempted to trap Him with questions, yet His responses often revealed something beneath the question itself. He saw the motive, fear, hypocrisy, or longing underneath the words.

True wisdom does not merely know more.

It sees deeper.

Subscribe now

Faith

Paul also identifies faith as a spiritual gift. This seems strange at first because faith appears throughout Christianity as something expected of everyone. Perhaps, however, Paul was describing something beyond ordinary belief—the unusual ability to trust when circumstances provide little reason for confidence.

There are people who seem capable of holding hope when everyone else has surrendered it. They do not necessarily deny reality. They simply sense possibilities others cannot yet see.

This kind of faith can become contagious. One person’s trust strengthens another person’s courage.

Yet faith becomes dangerous when confused with certainty. Genuine faith does not require pretending that we know everything God is doing. Sometimes the deepest faith simply says, I do not understand this, but I will continue walking.

Faith may therefore be less about possessing answers and more about continuing the journey when answers disappear.

Healing

Few spiritual gifts generate more hope—or more controversy—than healing.

The Gospels portray healing as central to Jesus’ ministry. He restored sight, mobility, dignity, belonging, and hope. Some healings were physical, but others clearly reached much deeper. Jesus touched people whom society considered untouchable. He restored those who had been rejected. He forgave those burdened by guilt. He brought fragmented lives back toward wholeness.

Perhaps healing should therefore be understood more broadly than the miraculous disappearance of disease.

A doctor may participate in healing. So may a nurse, counselor, caregiver, parent, friend, minister, or stranger who sits quietly beside someone suffering. A person who helps reconcile a broken relationship participates in healing. Someone who speaks hope into despair may participate in healing. Even listening without judgment can sometimes become a form of healing.

This does not eliminate the possibility of unusual or unexplained healing. It simply keeps us from limiting God’s healing activity to dramatic events.

The Spirit may heal through prayer.

The Spirit may also heal through human hands.

Discernment of Spirits

The phrase “discernment of spirits” can sound mysterious. Some interpret it primarily as the ability to distinguish good spirits from evil ones. That may be part of its historical meaning, but there is also a powerful inner meaning.

Discernment is the ability to recognize what is moving us.

Where did this thought come from? Why did that comment affect me so strongly? Is this action arising from love or fear? Am I speaking because something needs to be said, or because my ego wants recognition? Is this inner prompting genuine guidance, emotional reaction, imagination, conditioning, or desire?

That kind of discernment requires something very close to what we have repeatedly explored throughout this series: awareness.

There must be something within us capable of observing the thought rather than immediately becoming the thought.

A reaction may arise, but I do not necessarily have to obey it. Anger may appear, but I can observe the anger. Fear may appear, but I can question what it is telling me. Compassion may arise, and I can choose to follow it.

Perhaps spiritual discernment begins when consciousness creates a small space between what arises within us and what we choose to become.

Prophecy — More Than Predicting the Future

When modern people hear the word prophecy, they often think primarily about predicting future events. Biblical prophecy, however, was usually much broader.

The prophets were often people who saw clearly what others had normalized.

They confronted injustice, corruption, exploitation, idolatry, hypocrisy, and spiritual blindness. They interpreted events through a spiritual lens and called people back toward truth.

Prophetic vision therefore may not simply mean seeing what will happen.

It may mean seeing what is happening more clearly than others do.

That kind of vision can be uncomfortable. A prophet often disturbs people because genuine insight exposes things the community would rather leave hidden.

Yet even prophecy must pass Paul’s greater test.

Without love, it becomes merely another clanging cymbal.

Tongues and the Mystery of Spiritual Experience

Few gifts have created more disagreement among Christians than speaking in tongues. Some traditions consider it an essential sign of receiving the Holy Spirit. Others believe it belonged primarily to the earliest church. Still others interpret it psychologically, symbolically, or mystically.

Whatever position we take, Paul’s primary concern was surprisingly practical.

He wanted spiritual experience to build people up rather than create confusion.

In 1 Corinthians 14, Paul repeatedly emphasizes understanding, order, interpretation, and the strengthening of the community. Even an authentic spiritual experience was not meant to become a performance.

This gives us another valuable principle.

Not every genuine spiritual experience needs to become public.

Some experiences may be deeply meaningful to the individual while having little value when imposed upon someone else. Mystical experience requires humility precisely because something can be profoundly real to the person experiencing it while remaining impossible to prove to anyone else.

Paul’s instruction essentially asks: What does this experience produce?

That remains a remarkably useful question.

The Gifts We Often Overlook

Sometimes discussions about spiritual gifts focus so heavily on miraculous abilities that we overlook the quieter gifts Paul mentions elsewhere.

Serving.

Teaching.

Encouraging.

Giving.

Leading.

Mercy.

These may appear ordinary, yet imagine a world without them.

The person who notices someone sitting alone and walks over to speak with them may be exercising a spiritual gift. The person who patiently teaches someone who struggles to understand may be exercising a gift. The person who quietly repairs something at the church, prepares food for a grieving family, drives an elderly neighbor to an appointment, or gives without expecting recognition may be expressing the Spirit every bit as genuinely as someone standing behind a pulpit.

We often look for God in the spectacular while God may be moving quietly through ordinary human kindness.

Perhaps many people have spiritual gifts without ever calling them spiritual.

Gifts May Change Throughout Life

Another possibility is that our gifts are not necessarily fixed.

Different stages of life may call forth different expressions of the Spirit. A young person may possess tremendous physical energy for service. Later that same person’s experience may become wisdom. Someone who once led publicly may eventually become the quiet mentor encouraging others from behind the scenes.

Even our wounds may become gifts.

A person who has experienced grief may become unusually sensitive to another person’s grief. Someone who has struggled through illness may develop compassion that cannot be learned from a textbook. Someone who has made serious mistakes may eventually become uniquely capable of helping someone walking the same dangerous road.

The very place we once considered weakness may someday become the place through which compassion enters the world.

The wound does not automatically become a gift.

But when transformed, it can.

The Gift Is for Someone Else

Perhaps the simplest way to understand spiritual gifts is hidden in Paul’s words:

“But the manifestation of the Spirit is given to every man to profit withal.”
— 1 Corinthians 12:7

The gift is given for the good of others.

That changes everything.

A spiritual gift is not primarily something that makes me special. It is something entrusted to me that may help another person.

If I have wisdom, someone needs that wisdom.

If I can teach, someone needs understanding.

If I can encourage, someone somewhere is discouraged.

If I have resources to give, someone has a need.

If I possess compassion, there is suffering nearby.

If I can lead, there are people who need direction.

If I can heal, something is wounded.

Seen this way, discovering our spiritual gifts is not really about asking, “What makes me special?”

The better question may be:

“What has been placed within me that could become a blessing to someone else?”

When the Instrument Becomes Quiet

There may be an even deeper level to this teaching.

Imagine a musician playing through an instrument. The instrument does not create the music by itself, but neither is the instrument irrelevant. Its shape, tone, condition, and uniqueness influence how the music sounds.

Perhaps each human personality is something like that.

The Spirit moves through different people differently because every person is a different instrument.

The problem comes when the instrument thinks it is the musician.

Then the ego takes possession of the gift.

But when the inner noise becomes quieter—when the need for recognition, control, superiority, and certainty begins to loosen—perhaps the deeper music becomes easier to hear.

This may be why humility appears again and again in genuine spiritual traditions. Humility is not thinking poorly of ourselves. It is recognizing that whatever goodness moves through us did not originate entirely with the little personality we ordinarily call me.

We participate in something larger.

Fruit and Gifts Belong Together

The Fruit of the Spirit and the Gifts of the Spirit should never really be separated.

Fruit without gifts may become spirituality that remains inward and never serves the world. Gifts without fruit can become ego, manipulation, spiritual pride, or even abuse.

The two need each other.

The fruit reveals the character of the Spirit.
The gifts reveal the activity of the Spirit.

Love tells us how the gift should be used.

Wisdom helps us know when to use it.

Humility reminds us where it came from.

And service reveals why it was given.

Perhaps this is why Paul’s entire discussion of spiritual gifts ultimately revolves around one central reality:

There are many gifts.

There are many people.

There are many ways of serving.

But there is one Spirit moving through them all.

A Question for the Inner Journey

Most of us have probably spent considerable time asking what we want from God.

Perhaps the Gifts of the Spirit invite us to reverse the question.

Instead of asking only,

“What can God do for me?”

we might begin asking,

“What is the Spirit trying to do through me?”

That question requires no dramatic supernatural experience. The answer may already be appearing in the places where our abilities, compassion, experience, wounds, interests, and the needs of others intersect.

Maybe we do not have to search very far.

The gift may already be quietly waiting within the Garden.

And perhaps our task is simply to become still enough, humble enough, and awake enough to allow it to be used.

Coming Next — Part 38: The Body of Christ — Many Members, One Living Whole

Paul’s image of humanity as one body with many members takes the idea of spiritual gifts one step further. What if the Body of Christ is more than an institution or a religious organization? What if it points toward an awakening realization that beneath all our differences, humanity is deeply interconnected—and that what happens to one part of the body ultimately affects the whole?

Next

Can you think of anyone who could benefit from these articles? If so maybe you could hit share and send this on.

Share

Leave a comment

Subscribe now

In the previous part, we looked at the Armor of God as something deeper than protection from enemies outside ourselves. The armor can be understood as the qualities of consciousness that help us remain centered when fear, anger, temptation, pride, resentment, and the pressures of life attempt to pull us away from who we are becoming. But armor is not the destination. It protects something that is growing, and Paul gives us a remarkable picture of that growth in his letter to the Galatians: “But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, meekness, temperance...” (Galatians 5:22–23).

We often read these words as a list of behaviors Christians ought to practice. We should try harder to be loving, more patient, more peaceful, more self-controlled. There is certainly value in making those efforts, but Paul may be pointing toward something much deeper. He does not call these qualities the rules of the Spirit, the requirements of the Spirit, or even the achievements of the Spirit. He calls them fruit. And fruit is not manufactured. Fruit grows.

The Tree Reveals What Is Within

Imagine an apple tree in late summer. The tree does not spend its days worrying about whether it is producing enough apples, comparing itself with the tree beside it, or straining to prove what kind of tree it is. If it is alive, rooted in good soil, receiving sunlight and water, its fruit eventually appears because that fruit is the natural expression of what the tree has become. Jesus used this same imagery repeatedly, saying that a good tree brings forth good fruit and that a tree can be known by what it produces.

That gives Paul’s teaching a different meaning. Perhaps the Fruit of the Spirit is not primarily a list of virtues we are supposed to imitate from the outside. It is a description of what naturally begins appearing in a person whose inner life is being transformed. We can pretend to be patient for a while. We can force ourselves to speak kindly. We can suppress anger while outwardly appearing calm. But sooner or later life shakes the tree, and what comes out of us reveals something about what has actually been growing within.

Jesus said, “By their fruits ye shall know them.” We usually apply that statement to other people, but perhaps it becomes far more useful when we turn it inward. What comes out of me when someone criticizes me? What happens when I do not get my way? What arises when someone insults me, disappoints me, ignores me, or challenges something I believe? What happens when I am frightened or when another person is hurting? These moments reveal far more about our spiritual condition than merely saying what we believe.

A person may possess tremendous knowledge of Scripture and still live primarily through anger, fear, judgment, resentment, or hostility. Another person may have far less theological knowledge yet display compassion, patience, forgiveness, kindness, and peace. That does not mean we should begin judging everyone around us according to how spiritual we think they are. It means the teaching can become a mirror through which we examine ourselves.

Love

The first fruit Paul names is love, and perhaps all the others grow from it. Biblical love is much larger than affection or liking someone. Jesus pushed love into uncomfortable territory when he spoke of loving enemies, blessing those who curse us, and praying for those who mistreat us. That kind of love does not arise easily from the ordinary ego because the ego naturally separates the world into those who are for us and those who are against us. It remembers insults, builds defenses, wants recognition, and often wants to be proven right.

Love sees beyond the immediate personality. That does not mean allowing people to abuse us, pretending harmful behavior is acceptable, or refusing to establish boundaries. Sometimes love tells the truth. Sometimes love says no. Sometimes love walks away. Yet even in those circumstances, something changes when we no longer need to hate the person on the other side. We may begin to see the wounded, frightened, struggling human being behind the behavior without excusing what that person is doing. In doing so, we become less likely to allow another person’s behavior to determine the kind of person we become.

Joy and Peace

Joy is interesting because Paul does not simply speak of happiness. Happiness is often dependent upon circumstances. We feel happy because something pleasant happened, someone praised us, the family is getting along, the bills are paid, or life is unfolding according to our expectations. Joy seems to arise from somewhere deeper. A person can experience sorrow and still possess joy. Grief and joy can even exist together because spiritual joy may come from discovering that beneath the changing circumstances of life there is something within us that circumstances cannot completely control.

Peace may be understood in much the same way. We often imagine peace as the absence of trouble, yet Jesus lived in a world filled with political oppression, poverty, religious conflict, sickness, and violence. His own path eventually led directly toward the Cross, and still he spoke of a peace that the world could not give. Perhaps this peace is not produced by arranging the outer world perfectly. It comes from discovering a still place within ourselves that does not have to participate in every disturbance.

A thought may appear, an emotion may arise, or someone may say something that irritates us, yet there can be a moment in which we simply observe what is happening. We do not immediately have to become the anger, the fear, or the argument. We can allow something to be present within the Garden without allowing it to become king of the Garden. That ability to observe without immediately identifying may be one of the beginnings of peace.

Patience, Kindness, and Goodness

The King James Version uses the beautiful old word longsuffering, while modern translations usually say patience. True patience is not simply waiting quietly while secretly boiling inside. It is the growing ability to allow life to unfold without demanding that every person, event, and circumstance immediately conform to our expectations. Most of us have an internal picture of how things should happen. People should behave differently, traffic should move faster, our bodies should work better, family members should understand us, and our plans should succeed. When reality disagrees with those expectations, frustration appears.

Patience begins when we notice the reaction without immediately obeying it. There may be a small space between what happens and what we do next, and that space may be one of the most important places in the spiritual life because it is there that awareness can enter. Instead of responding mechanically, we may begin to choose.

Kindness and goodness bring spirituality into the ordinary details of life. It is easy to discuss theology, prophecy, consciousness, enlightenment, salvation, mystical experience, or the nature of God, but eventually someone interrupts us, someone needs help, someone is lonely, or someone makes a mistake. In those moments, all our spiritual theories are tested. Kindness may be as simple as a telephone call, an encouraging word, listening without needing to correct someone, or helping when there is nothing for us to gain. Goodness goes further into the growing desire to do what is right even when nobody is watching. These quiet actions may reveal spiritual development more accurately than dramatic religious experiences ever could.

Faithfulness and Gentleness

The word Paul uses for faith can also carry the meaning of faithfulness, trustworthiness, and steadfastness. Faith is often reduced to believing the correct doctrines, but faithfulness asks something more demanding: What kind of person am I becoming when no one is watching? Can people trust me? Do I keep my word? Do I remain faithful to what I know is right when doing so becomes inconvenient? Am I willing to follow truth even when truth forces me to reconsider something I have believed for years?

A sincere spiritual seeker may sometimes discover that faith requires changing one’s beliefs rather than defending them. If our deepest prayer is, “Father, I want to know the truth even if it changes the way I believe,” then faithfulness may mean remaining loyal to truth rather than remaining loyal to our previous understanding of it.

Gentleness is also much stronger than it first appears. Gentleness is not weakness. Anyone can strike back when wounded, shout when angry, or humiliate someone when given enough power. Gentleness requires enough inner strength that we no longer need to prove our strength. Jesus could confront hypocrisy with great force while also showing tenderness toward the sick, the poor, the outsider, the person considered unclean, and those rejected by society. Something within him seemed capable of seeing deeper than the labels placed upon people. Perhaps gentleness begins when we learn to do the same.

Self-Control and the Observer Within

The final fruit Paul mentions is temperance, usually translated today as self-control. Its placement is interesting because genuine self-control is not simply repression. There is a difference between forcing ourselves to behave and becoming inwardly free enough that impulses no longer control us. Anger may appear, but it does not have to speak. Fear may appear, but it does not have to decide. Desire may appear, but it does not have to command. A judgment may appear, but we do not automatically have to believe it.

This brings us again to the mystery of awareness. If I can observe anger arising within me, then the anger cannot be the whole of me. If I can notice a fearful thought, there must be something that is noticing the thought. If I can observe the impulse to react before I act upon it, then another level of consciousness has appeared. That small moment of observation may be where genuine self-control begins.

This also connects with the deeper question we have returned to in several parts of this series: If I can observe the emotion or reaction, what is doing the observing? Perhaps that awareness is not merely another thought among thoughts but the place within us from which transformation becomes possible.

Fruit Cannot Be Faked Forever

Religion can sometimes create pressure to appear spiritual. We learn the correct language, the correct behavior, and the outward image expected of us. We may even become skilled at looking righteous while still carrying anger, pride, resentment, judgment, or fear beneath the surface. Jesus repeatedly confronted this problem in the religious life of his day. His concern was not simply that people obey outward rules but that transformation occur from the inside outward.

Fruit eventually reveals the condition of the tree. We may fool others for a while and perhaps even fool ourselves, but life has a way of exposing what is actually inside us. The spiritual life, then, is not primarily about appearing holy. It is about becoming whole.

Christ Formed Within

This opens another way of thinking about salvation. We often think of salvation almost entirely as something that happens to us: a belief is accepted, a prayer is spoken, a theological condition is satisfied, and our eternal destination changes. Yet Jesus repeatedly used images of growth. He spoke of seeds, soil, trees, branches, vines, harvests, and fruit. Even the Kingdom of God was compared to a tiny seed that gradually grows.

Perhaps salvation also includes something profoundly developmental. Christ is not merely someone we believe something about; the life revealed in Christ is something gradually being formed within us. Paul expressed this beautifully when he wrote of his desire that “Christ be formed in you.” That is remarkable language because it points beyond merely believing in Christ toward becoming inwardly transformed by the same qualities of love, compassion, truth, courage, mercy, and awareness that Jesus embodied.

How would we know that this transformation is taking place? Paul gives us the evidence: love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control. The fruit reveals the tree.

The Vine and the Branches

Jesus gave perhaps the clearest image when he said, “I am the vine, ye are the branches.” A branch does not create fruit independently. Life flows through it. The branch remains connected to the source, and fruit gradually appears. Jesus continued by saying that the one who abides in him brings forth much fruit.

This suggests that prayer, meditation, self-observation, forgiveness, contemplation, service, Scripture, silence, and sincere searching may not be ways of earning God’s favor. They may instead be ways of keeping the branch open to the Vine. Something greater than the ordinary ego can begin flowing through us, and the evidence of that connection becomes visible not primarily in extraordinary experiences but in the kind of person we are becoming.

Get the King Out of the Garden

This brings us once again to the image that has become central to this journey: Get the King Out of the Garden. The Garden can symbolize the inner field of consciousness where thoughts, emotions, memories, fears, desires, and reactions continually appear. None of them necessarily create a problem simply because they are present. The difficulty begins when one of them takes the throne.

Anger may become king. Fear may become king. Pride, resentment, the need to be right, or the need for approval may become king. Once one of these takes the throne, our actions begin producing the fruit of whichever king is ruling. Yet when we can observe what is happening without immediately becoming identified with it, something begins to change. The false king starts to lose its authority.

Perhaps what gradually emerges is not an empty throne but another kind of rule altogether: the rule of love, conscience, compassion, awareness, and the Spirit within. The false king leaves the Garden so that the true King can be discovered there.

A Different Way to Measure Spiritual Growth

Perhaps we sometimes measure spiritual progress using the wrong things. We may ask how much Scripture we know, how often we attend church, what doctrines we believe, how many spiritual books we have read, or whether we have had unusual mystical experiences. All of these things may have value, but Jesus and Paul give us a much simpler measurement: What fruit is growing?

Am I more loving than I once was? Am I more patient and less easily offended? Am I more compassionate toward people who struggle? Am I more peaceful when circumstances do not go my way? Can I notice anger without immediately becoming angry? Am I more willing to forgive, more willing to admit when I am wrong, and more capable of seeing another person’s humanity even when I strongly disagree with them?

These questions are far more demanding than theological ones because they bring spirituality into everyday life. But perhaps everyday life is exactly where spiritual transformation is supposed to occur.

The Harvest

A seed disappears beneath the soil before anything visible happens. For a time, it may appear that nothing is occurring, but eventually a shoot emerges, then a plant, then blossoms, and finally fruit. The spiritual journey may work in much the same way. Years of struggle, questioning, suffering, mistakes, prayer, searching, forgiveness, and self-observation may slowly change something within us that we cannot immediately see.

Then one day something happens that once would have caused anger, and it no longer has the same power. Someone criticizes us, and instead of immediately defending ourselves, we become curious about our reaction. Someone who once hurt us comes to mind, and instead of resentment we unexpectedly feel compassion. A circumstance we cannot control arises, and somewhere beneath the uncertainty there remains a quiet peace.

These moments may seem small, but perhaps they are the harvest. The Fruit of the Spirit is not a badge proving that we have become spiritual. It is evidence that something living has begun growing within us. The deeper question, then, may no longer be simply, “Do I believe in the Spirit?” but rather, “What is the Spirit growing in me?”

Coming Next — Part 37: The Gifts of the Spirit

If the Fruit of the Spirit describes the character that grows as the inner person is transformed, the Gifts of the Spirit raise another fascinating question. Paul describes wisdom, knowledge, faith, healing, prophecy, discernment, and other gifts, not as trophies that make one person more spiritual than another but as different expressions of one Spirit working through many members of one body.

In the next part, we can explore what those gifts may mean both literally and symbolically, and why discovering our particular gift may have much more to do with service than with spiritual status.

Next

Share

Leave a comment

When Paul wrote about putting on the “whole armor of God,” he used an image that his readers would have immediately understood. Roman soldiers were everywhere in the first-century world, and their belts, breastplates, shields, helmets, swords, and heavy footwear were familiar sights. Paul took that outward picture and transformed it into an inward spiritual teaching. “Put on the whole armour of God,” he wrote, “that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil” (Ephesians 6:11).

For many Christians, the Armor of God has been understood almost entirely as protection against an external supernatural enemy. There may certainly be realities beyond what our physical senses perceive, but Paul’s words become even more personally meaningful when we recognize that the battlefield also exists within us. Fear, resentment, pride, deception, temptation, discouragement, uncontrolled desire, and the wounded portions of our own personality can influence us long before any outside force ever does. Paul himself hints at this deeper understanding when he writes that our struggle is “not against flesh and blood.” The real enemy is not primarily the other person. It is not the neighbor who disagrees with us, the politician we dislike, the person of another religion, or even someone who has wounded us. The deeper struggle involves the invisible powers that work through fear, hatred, deception, division, domination, and spiritual blindness, and some of the easiest places for those forces to find expression are within the unexamined regions of our own hearts.

The Armor of God, then, may be understood as the qualities of consciousness that allow us to remain spiritually centered while passing through a world that constantly attempts to pull us away from truth, love, peace, courage, and faithfulness.

The Battlefield Within

Before looking at the individual pieces of armor, it may be important to reconsider what “spiritual warfare” actually means. Throughout history, people have often interpreted religious warfare outwardly. When evil is projected entirely onto other people, religion can become dangerous, because the other person can begin to be seen not simply as mistaken, but as an enemy of God. Once that happens, almost anything can be justified in the name of righteousness.

History gives us sobering examples. During the Crusades, armies marched beneath the symbol of the cross believing that killing religious enemies could somehow serve Christ. During the witch hunts, thousands were accused, tortured, or killed because communities became convinced that evil resided in particular individuals among them. Similar patterns have appeared whenever religious certainty has combined with fear, suspicion, and the conviction that darkness is always somewhere outside ourselves.

Yet Jesus repeatedly turned attention in the opposite direction. He warned about judging another while ignoring the beam in our own eye. He taught that murder begins in anger and hatred long before the physical act occurs, and that adultery begins within desire before it becomes outward behavior. Again and again, Jesus moved morality from the external action to the internal condition that produces the action. In that sense, the true battlefield is human consciousness itself. The question becomes not simply, “Who is evil out there?” but, “What within me is capable of becoming fearful, hateful, deceptive, prideful, resentful, controlling, or self-righteous?” Once we begin asking that question honestly, Paul’s Armor of God becomes remarkably practical.

The Belt of Truth

Paul begins with truth: “Stand therefore, having your loins girt about with truth.” The belt of a Roman soldier helped hold the rest of his equipment in place, and symbolically Paul may be telling us that truth holds the spiritual life together. But truth requires far more than believing that our doctrines are correct. One of the greatest spiritual dangers is confusing certainty with truth, because a person can be completely certain and still be completely mistaken.

Truth therefore requires humility. It means being willing to admit that there may be something we do not yet understand and being willing to examine beliefs inherited from family, church, culture, politics, and society rather than defending them simply because they are familiar. Truth also requires honesty about ourselves. We may deceive others occasionally, but we can deceive ourselves continually. We justify anger, rationalize pride, disguise fear as righteousness, and convince ourselves that resentment is justified because the other person deserves it. The belt of truth means becoming willing to see reality as it actually is, even when that truth challenges the ego. A genuine seeker eventually discovers that truth is not something we possess once and for all; it is something we continually move toward.

The Breastplate of Righteousness

The breastplate protected the soldier’s heart and vital organs, and Paul calls this the “breastplate of righteousness.” Righteousness is sometimes interpreted as moral perfection, but the biblical concept is richer than simply following rules. It involves being rightly aligned with God, with others, and with the deeper conscience within ourselves. The breastplate protects the heart because integrity protects the inner life.

When our outward actions contradict what we inwardly know to be right, something begins dividing within us. We may hide our actions from others, but we cannot entirely hide them from ourselves. Over time, this inner contradiction can harden the heart. Righteousness is therefore not merely about avoiding punishment from God; it is about becoming internally whole. The more our thoughts, intentions, words, and actions come into harmony, the less divided we become.

Jesus repeatedly emphasized this inward righteousness. He criticized those who appeared righteous outwardly while remaining inwardly filled with pride, greed, hypocrisy, or the desire for status. He compared them to cups cleaned on the outside while remaining dirty within. True righteousness begins inside and eventually expresses itself outwardly. The breastplate protects the heart because a heart living in integrity has fewer places where deception can gain a foothold.

Feet Prepared With the Gospel of Peace

Paul next speaks of having our feet prepared with “the gospel of peace.” It is interesting that the spiritual soldier does not march carrying a gospel of conquest, but a gospel of peace. Feet represent movement. They determine where we go and how we walk through the world, and spiritually this raises a simple but important question: What do we carry into the places we enter?

Do we carry conflict into a room, or peace? Do we increase fear, or calm it? Do we deepen division, or attempt reconciliation? Do people leave our presence more agitated, or more peaceful? Jesus said, “Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God.” A peacemaker is not simply someone who avoids disagreement. Sometimes making peace requires walking directly into a difficult situation while refusing to become controlled by hostility. The spiritually mature person does not need everyone to agree with them before they can remain peaceful, because their peace comes from somewhere deeper than circumstances.

The Shield of Faith

The Roman shield was large enough to protect much of the soldier’s body, and soldiers could even interlock their shields to form a protective wall. Paul says that the shield of faith can extinguish the “fiery darts” aimed at us. Those darts may take many forms: fear, discouragement, doubt, temptation, shame, anxiety, anger, hopelessness, and despair. Anyone who has seriously pursued a spiritual path knows how quickly such thoughts can enter the mind and how convincing they can feel when we are tired, wounded, or afraid.

Faith does not necessarily mean believing that nothing difficult will ever happen. That kind of faith can be shattered the moment tragedy arrives. Deeper faith says that whatever happens, God is still present; whatever happens, something meaningful may still emerge from it; and whatever happens, I do not have to surrender my inner life to fear. Faith does not remove the storm, but it gives us something solid to stand upon while the storm passes.

There is also another beautiful image hidden within the Roman shield. Soldiers were strongest when their shields were joined together. Perhaps faith was never meant to be entirely solitary. Sometimes another person’s faith helps protect us when our own has temporarily weakened, just as at other times our faith may help carry someone else.

The Helmet of Salvation

The helmet protects the head, and symbolically salvation protects the mind. But salvation may mean far more than simply believing the correct theology so that we enter heaven after death. The biblical language of salvation often includes healing, rescue, deliverance, restoration, and becoming whole. The mind desperately needs this kind of salvation because much human suffering grows out of patterns of thought that repeat themselves endlessly.

We may tell ourselves, “I am not good enough,” “Nothing will ever change,” “That person ruined my life,” “Everyone is against me,” “I must always be right,” or “I can never forgive.” Repeated long enough, these thoughts begin shaping how we see ourselves, other people, and the world around us. The mind can become its own prison.

The helmet of salvation may therefore symbolize a transformed way of thinking. Paul expresses this elsewhere when he says, “Be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind.” Spiritual transformation requires a renewed mind because consciousness shapes how we experience reality. Two people can encounter the same event and interpret it completely differently depending upon the condition of their inner world. The helmet of salvation protects us from allowing every destructive thought that enters the mind to become part of our identity. A thought may enter the mind, but that does not mean we must believe it, feed it, or become it.

The Sword of the Spirit

The sword is the only offensive weapon Paul names, and he calls it “the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God.” The traditional interpretation identifies this with Scripture, and Scripture can certainly function this way. Jesus himself answered temptation by recalling spiritual truth. But the deeper meaning may extend beyond simply quoting verses.

The Word of God represents truth awakened within consciousness, and a sword symbolically separates. Spiritually, truth separates illusion from reality, ego from genuine conscience, fear from wisdom, and what we have merely inherited from what we have actually discovered. The spiritual sword is therefore also discernment.

Jesus demonstrated this repeatedly. He challenged interpretations of Scripture that were technically defensible yet spiritually lifeless. He distinguished between the letter of religious law and the deeper intention behind it. His repeated pattern of saying, “You have heard that it was said … but I say unto you …” was an exercise in spiritual discernment. He was cutting through accumulated layers of tradition in order to reveal the deeper spiritual principle underneath.

Prayer — The Atmosphere Surrounding the Armor

After describing the armor, Paul immediately turns to prayer: “Praying always with all prayer and supplication in the Spirit.” Prayer is not listed as another piece of armor, and perhaps that is because it is something larger. Prayer is the atmosphere in which all the armor functions.

Truth without prayer can become intellectual pride. Righteousness without prayer can become self-righteousness. Faith without prayer can become rigid belief, and Scripture without prayer can become merely words on a page. Prayer continually reconnects the personality with the deeper Source of spiritual life.

Prayer itself may also mature. At first, we often pray primarily by speaking, asking, pleading, and explaining. Eventually we may begin learning to listen. The deeper prayer becomes, the less it is about convincing God to do what we want and the more it becomes an opening through which our own consciousness is brought into alignment with something greater than ourselves. In that sense, prayer is not simply speaking toward God; it is becoming receptive to God.

Standing Rather Than Attacking

Perhaps one of the most overlooked words in this entire passage is the word stand. Paul repeatedly says, “that ye may be able to stand,” “having done all, to stand,” and “stand therefore.” The purpose of the armor is not primarily to attack. It is to remain standing.

That changes the entire image. The spiritually mature person does not need to defeat everyone who disagrees with them. They do not need to conquer every opponent, win every argument, or prove every doctrine. They simply need to remain centered in truth, love, courage, peace, and faith when the forces around them attempt to pull them away from those qualities.

Sometimes the greatest spiritual victory is simply refusing to become what we are fighting against. If another person is angry, we do not have to become angry. If another person lies, we do not have to become deceptive. If another person hates us, we do not have to return hatred. If someone behaves unjustly toward us, we can oppose the injustice without allowing bitterness to take possession of our own hearts. That may be one of the deepest meanings of Paul’s words, “having done all, to stand.”

The Armor Must Become Part of Us

There is another important distinction. Paul does not tell us merely to admire the armor, study the armor, or talk about the armor. He tells us to put it on. Truth must become something we live. Righteousness must become character. Peace must become the way we walk. Faith must become inner stability. Salvation must become renewed consciousness, and the Word must become discernment alive within us.

Otherwise religion remains external. We can carry a Bible and still live in fear. We can attend church and still carry resentment. We can defend doctrine while refusing to forgive. We can speak constantly about spiritual warfare while never confronting the warfare occurring within our own hearts. The Armor of God is not religious decoration; it describes what a human being gradually becomes as spiritual transformation takes place.

Perhaps the Enemy Has Been Closer Than We Thought

Many of us were taught to look outward for spiritual enemies, but Jesus continually directed attention inward. The kingdom is within. The beam is in our own eye. The heart is where hatred begins, and it is also where forgiveness begins. Perhaps the deepest spiritual warfare occurs when truth begins confronting those parts of ourselves that would rather remain hidden.

Our pride resists humility. Our fear resists faith. Our resentment resists forgiveness. Our ego resists surrender. Our certainty resists deeper truth. Yet every time we choose differently, another piece of the armor becomes stronger. Every time we respond with patience instead of anger, honesty instead of self-deception, compassion instead of judgment, or faith instead of fear, the armor becomes less of an idea and more of a lived reality.

The Armor of God may therefore represent far more than supernatural protection. It may describe the gradual formation of the spiritually awakened human being: a person capable of moving through a fearful and divided world without becoming consumed by its fear and division. The greatest spiritual warrior may not be the person who sees demons everywhere, but the person who has learned to recognize darkness when it arises within themselves and refuses to allow it to govern their life.

Perhaps that is why Paul’s final instruction is so simple and yet so profound: stand. Stand in truth, righteousness, peace, faith, renewed consciousness, and the Spirit. When everything around us—or within us—attempts to pull us away from the person God is calling us to become, the task is not always to fight harder.

Sometimes the task is simply to remain standing.

Part 36 coming next— The Fruit of the Spirit: What Spiritual Transformation Looks Like

After Paul’s conversion, his thorn in the flesh, and the Armor of God, this would naturally move from how the spiritual person is strengthened and protected to what that transformed life actually produces:

“The fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, meekness, temperance…” — Galatians 5:22–23

Next

Share

Leave a comment